Sunday, July 5, 2015
1012 C Street  •  Floresville, TX 78114  •  Phone: 830-216-4519  •  Fax: 830-393-3219  • 

WCN Site Search


Lost & Found


VideoLost Dog:She is a 14 yr old female blue healer/corgi mix. Last seen on 4th st near Eagle Wrecker. If seen please call 8172435617
Our beloved Gracie is missing since October, Dachshund/Lab mix, microchipped, about 30 pounds, black with little white. $1000 reward for safe return. Call with any information, 830-393-9999 or 419-250-9099.

VideoFound female med sized dog on Hickory Hill Dr in LaVernia. Pic in WCNews online ad. Probably not neutered, very playful and gets along well with cats. Please call 830-947-3458
More Lost & Found ads ›

Help Wanted

Karnes/Wilson Juvenile Probation Department is seeking the following positions: Juvenile Probation Officer: Must be degreed in Criminal Justice or related field with experience working with children and parents. Position is year round supervising juvenile offenders, making recommendations to court, curfew checks, and being on call. Attendance/Juvenile Probation Officer: Must be degreed in Criminal Justice or related field with experience working with children and parents. The Attendance Officer works same hours as the school districts providing prevention services to children and parents who have issues with truancy. Juvenile Probation Officer will manage a small caseload of juvenile offenders making recommendations to court, curfew checks, and being on call. Position is year round.  Individual must be versatile and able to separate prevention from intervention skills. Prevention Specialist: Position acts as a drill instructor within the environment of the Juvenile Justice Alternative Education Program (JJAEP). Follows JJAEP school calendar. This is a quasi-military program, so prior military experience a plus. Degreed individual preferred with experience working with children. Must be a Juvenile Supervision Officer or be able to obtain the certification. Administrative Prevention Specialist: Position acts as a drill instructor but takes on administrative assistant role to the Assistant Chief within the Juvenile Justice Alternative Education Program (JJAEP). Position will include direct contact with the child and parent. Must be a Juvenile Supervision Officer or able to obtain. Prefer degreed individual. Must have knowledge of military procedures. To apply send resume to n-schmidt@kwjpd.com.
Experienced dog groomer needed at Floresville area dog grooming and boarding business. Apply by calling, 210-621-4602.
More Help Wanted ads ›

Featured Videos





Video Vault ›
You’ve been granted free access to this subscribers only article.

Agriculture Today


Cattle raisers support protecting groundwater




E-Mail this Story to a Friend
Print this Story
March 15, 2011 | 3,547 views | Post a comment

AUSTIN -- Members of the Texas and Southwestern Cattle Raisers Association gathered at the state capitol March 1 to show their support for Senate Bill (SB) 332.

SB 332, introduced by Sen. Troy Fraser, amends the Texas Water Code by clarifying that landowners own the groundwater beneath their land, and that they have a right to capture it. SB 332 in no way takes away authority from groundwater conservation districts to protect aquifers. SB 332 would, however, require groundwater conservation districts to justify their actions when regulating the right to capture water.

Texas and Southwestern Cattle Raisers Association Legislative and Tax Committee Chairman Arthur Uhl, a rancher and attorney from San Antonio, testified before the Senate Natural Resources Committee on behalf of the bill.

“SB 332 has become necessary to legislatively reaffirm well settled Texas law that the landowner owns the groundwater under their land,” Uhl said.

“Unfortunately, a few groundwater conservation districts have taken the legal position that the landowner has no interest in groundwater -- that groundwater is somehow not owned by anyone, or is owned by the state. This is a misguided attempt on the part of a few districts to enhance their ability to regulate. The problem is that this position is legally incorrect, unconstitutional, and unnecessary.”

The cattle raisers association “supports reasonable regulation through local groundwater conservation districts,” Uhl said. “We believe groundwater is most fairly and efficiently managed by local groundwater districts. While SB 332 clarifies that landowners have an ownership interest in groundwater below the land and that they have a right to produce it, it does not take authority away from groundwater districts.”

Groundwater conservation districts are concerned that SB 332 would lead to more lawsuits, or takings claims, from landowners and bankrupt groundwater conservation districts.

According to Uhl and the cattle raisers association, this is false for two reasons. Uhl said that state agencies and local governments deal with and regulate private property every day and do not face countless lawsuits. “For example, the same way a person can own a car and the state can effectively regulate the use of that car, a landowner can own groundwater and the district can effectively regulate the use of that groundwater. Likewise, our cities and counties can tell us what we can and can’t do with and on our property, groundwater districts can tell us if we can drill a well, where we can drill a well, and how much groundwater we can pump,” Uhl said.

Second, Uhl said there are significant legal obstacles and financial disincentives facing a landowner wanting to bring a takings claim. There are substantial and well-settled legal standards that landowners must meet. What’s more, if the landowner loses, under Chapter 36 of the Water Code, the landowner can be required to pay the legal fees of the district. This is not required of the groundwater conservation district if the landowner wins. All of these factors serve as deterrents to landowners to sue a groundwater conservation district. SB 332 does not change that. “Landowners believe that the state can have effective groundwater regulation and management while still respecting landowners’ ownership interest in groundwater below the surface. The fact that groundwater regulation and management may require more justification and may cost more does not justify taking landowners’ private property,” Uhl concluded.

For more details regarding groundwater ownership and SB 332, visit www.groundwaterownership.com.
 

Your Opinions and Comments


Be the first to comment on this story!


You must be logged in to post a comment.




Not a subscriber?
Subscriber, but no password?
Forgot password?

Agriculture Today Archives


Coupons ag-right
auto chooserVoncille Bielefeld homeDrama KidsAllstate & McBride RealtyTriple R DC ExpertsHeavenly Touch home

  Copyright © 2007-2015 Wilson County News. All rights reserved. Web development by Drewa Designs.