Saturday, February 6, 2016
1012 C Street  •  Floresville, TX 78114  •  Phone: 830-216-4519  •  Fax: 830-393-3219  • 

WCN Site Search


Preview the Paper Preview the Paper

Preview this week's Paper
A limited number of pages are displayed in this preview.
Preview this Week’s Issue ›
Subscribe Today ›

Lost & Found


VideoREWARD. LOST CAT: Gray and white male cat, since Nov. 13, on C.R. 429, Stockdale, wearing a silver collar. Call 512-629-2005 with any information.
Bear, please come home! Missing since October 22, 2014, black Manx cat (no tail), shy. Reward! Help him find his way home. 210-635-7560.
Found: Basset Hound, Hwy. 97 W./Hospital Blvd., Floresville. Call 830-391-2153 between 9 a.m.-11:30 p.m.
More Lost & Found ads ›

Help Wanted

Giggles and Smiles Learning Center now hiring teachers, must have high school diploma or GED, on job training, morning and afternoon shifts available. Inquire at 2000 10th St., Floresville, 830-393-3814 
Globe Energy Services is accepting applications for Vacuum truck driver operator, Winch truck driver operator for Karnes City terminal, and mechanic for Kenedy or Nixon area, competitive pay, great benefits. For more information, 830-400-2717. All interviews must be scheduled and must be performed in person.
More Help Wanted ads ›

Featured Videos





Video Vault ›
You’ve been granted free access to this subscribers only article.

Agriculture Today


Groundwater debate continues




E-Mail this Story to a Friend
Print this Story
May 18, 2011 | 3,108 views | Post a comment

As associations representing more than 400,000 Texans who own millions of acres of private property, we want to stress the importance of SB 332.

For more than a century, groundwater ownership in Texas has seemed clear -- landowners own the groundwater beneath their land.

In the 1904 Texas Supreme Court case of Houston & TC Railway Company v. East, the court said, “The owner of land is the absolute owner of the soil and of percolating water, which is a part of, and not different from, the soil.”

Unfortunately, opponents, including some groundwater conservation districts (GCDs), are trying to muddy the water. These opponents believe that landowners do not own the groundwater below their land. They’ve taken this to court and the Legislature. If they succeed, there is nothing preventing government from owning groundwater.

SB 332, introduced by Sen. Troy Fraser and sponsored by Rep. Allan Ritter, would reaffirm that landowners own the groundwater beneath their land and are entitled to a fair chance to produce it.

During committee meetings in both the Senate and the House, opponents to SB 332 spoke about the fear of GCDs losing authority and of takings lawsuits against GCDs. Both of these claims are false, and here’s why.

Every property right can be regulated. Groundwater is no different. In fact, state law and the Texas Constitution specifically require groundwater to be managed and protected. This is largely accomplished by GCDs. SB 332 doesn’t change this. To be certain that SB 332 does not impact GCDs, their current authority to issue permits to drill wells, enforce the spacing of wells, and limit the amount of groundwater that can be produced from each well is restated in SB 332.

Contrary to what opponents of SB 332 argue, GCDs can still regulate without the fear of losing takings lawsuits. If GCDs are following the law and their rules, they shouldn’t be afraid of takings lawsuits. Cities and other government entities regulate property rights every day without the fear of being sued by landowners. Why would GCDs be any different? Furthermore, a well-established set of legal factors is used by a court to determine what constitutes a taking. SB 332 does not change those factors.

Current Texas law goes even further to protect the interests of GCDs should a takings lawsuit be brought against them. GCDs have a protection under the law that other government entities don’t. If a landowner sues them and loses, they pay the attorney fees of the GCD. That is a one-way protection. If the landowner wins, the GCD doesn’t pay their fees.

It is expensive to sue the government, especially a GCD. That is why there is no “flood” of takings lawsuits. This won’t change if SB 332 becomes law.

In most cases, landowners lose, but it is the only defense they have when government goes too far. If a landowner does not own the groundwater below their land, as the opponents to SB 332 argue, a landowner can’t contest, let alone defend, a taking of their property because they have nothing to protect.

SB 332 will ensure landowners’ ownership interest in groundwater is protected so if government does try to take it, landowners at least have a fighting chance to stop them.

Landowners across the state want their ownership in groundwater below their land protected. They want to conserve their groundwater for future generations, but how can they conserve this precious resource if it is owned and controlled by someone else?

The Senate has passed SB 332 and now it is in the House. It is crucial that every landowner call their state representative and ask them to protect their ownership in groundwater below the land by supporting SB 332.

This information is provided by Texas Farm Bureau, Texas and Southwestern Cattle Raisers Association, Texas Wildlife Association, Association of Texas Soil and Water Conservation Districts, Exotic Wildlife Association, Riverside and Landowners Protection Coalition, South Texans’ Property Rights Association, Texas Association of Dairymen, Texas Cattle Feeders Association, Texas Forestry Association, Texas Land and Mineral Owners Association, Texas Poultry Federation, Texas Sheep and Goat Raisers Association.
 

Your Opinions and Comments


Be the first to comment on this story!


You must be logged in to post a comment.




Not a subscriber?
Subscriber, but no password?
Forgot password?

Agriculture Today Archives


Coupons ag-right
East Central Driving SchoolAllstate & McBride RealtyTriple R DC ExpertsHeavenly Touch homeVoncille Bielefeld home

  Copyright © 2007-2016 Wilson County News. All rights reserved. Web development by Drewa Designs.