Tuesday, October 21, 2014
1012 C Street  •  Floresville, TX 78114  •  Phone: 830-216-4519  •  Fax: 830-393-3219  • 

Lost & Found


Video Lost: Cat, black and white, last seen the evening of Sept. 29 in the Woodcreek Subdivision area, La Vernia. Reward for his safe return. Call Richard, 830-779-2080 or 210-776-4930.
Lost: Black female Chihuahua named Gloomy and black male Chihuahua named Rico, from CR 126, Floresville, missed dearly by their family! Call 210-428-3803. 
Found tan hunting dog. Elderly male not neutered or chipped. Please call 8303915099.
More Lost & Found ads ›

Help Wanted

Ace Electric Construction, JOURNEY AND APPRENTICE ELECTRICIANS, commercial, good pay with benefits, must be: drug free, have dependable transportation, and valid, clean driving record. Call 281-236-4813 or fax resume 281-339-0317.
Provider position in Wilson/Atascosa County, temporary part-time, hourly depending on family needs which may include some evening and weekend hours. Provides services to consumer with intellectual and developmental disabilities living in their own home or family home. Assists them with hygiene, housekeeping, meal preparation, and other services as needed. Trains individuals to do these activities independently.  Provides transportation to medical appointments, outings and other community access activities. Transportation will include travel out of the area and to other cities as  requires. High school diploma or GED, or pass competency test administered by Camino Real and provide 3 letters of reference; valid Texas driver’s license and acceptable driving record. Apply at Camino Real CS, 1325 3rd Street Floresville, or contact Human Resources for application 210-357-0359. www.caminorealcs.org. EOE.
More Help Wanted ads ›

Featured Videos





Video Vault ›

Commentaries


Bush Tax Cuts: 10 Years of Economic Disaster




E-Mail this Story to a Friend
Print this Story

Disclaimer:
The author of this entry is responsible for this content, which is not edited by the Wilson County News or wilsoncountynews.com.
June 16, 2011 | 1721 views | 5 comments

By Dr. William Barclay
This month marks the tenth anniversary of the first of the two tax cuts sought by the President George Bush. The Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act was enacted in 2001 to be followed, in 2003, by the Jobs and Growth Tax Relief Reconciliation Act. Ten years later, it is time we assess the actual results of these tax cuts, looking at economic performance rather than political promises.

The results have been a disaster for the US economy and for almost all of the American people. We have experienced very slow income and employment growth for the vast majority of families, an extremely unequal distribution of the direct financial benefits from these measures, and, very slow growth in the economy as a whole.

As someone who has personally received these tax cuts during the past 10 years, I feel it is my responsibility to speak out.

Supporters of tax cuts for high income households, such as House majority leader John Boehner, argue that wealthy people are the “job creators” and that tax cuts will encourage them to create jobs and that these new jobs will, in turn, increase employment opportunities and improve the wages of the remainder of the population. Did any of these benefits occur after the Bush tax cuts? The quick and accurate answer is, no, they did not. Adjusted for inflation, the median weekly earnings of working Americans actually fell by 2.3% from the end of the 2000 -- 01 recession to the onset of the Great Recession. This is unique in the post WWII period. Further, the recovery from the 2000 -- 01 recession was the slowest of any post WWII recession to date, requiring 39 months before the number of employed Americans reached the pre-recession level. Where is even a scintilla of evidence that tax cuts such as those passed in 2001 and 2003 generate income and employment growth for the vast majority of the population?

A significant part of the failure of the Bush tax cuts to generate jobs and income growth flows from the top-heavy distribution of the benefits conveyed by these measures. The vast bulk of the reduced taxes were reaped by a very small number of families. In 2011, the average tax reduction to families receiving an income of $1 million or more (about 321,000 families) will be $139,199. For this less than 0.5% of all families this is a reduction in taxes of $860 million/week.

Compare these tax benefits to the yearly savings proposed by cutting the WIC program: $833 million. An obvious question is, why can’t this very small group of extremely high income families give up just one week of their tax cut to provide nutrition for the tens of thousands of women and children that benefit from the WIC program? More significantly, in light of the deficit hysteria gripping Washington D.C., the combined impact of the 2001 and 2003 Bush tax cuts has been the addition of more than $2.6 trillion to the federal debt. This included more than $400 billion in interest payments on the debt necessary to pay for the cuts.

Of course, one might forgive these policy failures if the promise of economic growth had been fulfilled. On this measure, however, the record is even worse. The 2000 -- 01 recession ended in the fourth quarter of 2001, just in time for the first Bush tax cut to take effect. From the end of the recession until the onset of the Great Recession, the economy grew at a slower rate than in any other post recession period since WWII. Thus, despite promises from the advocates of the tax cuts, the reality was slower growth rather than faster growth. The additional tax cut in 2003 did nothing to increase the pace of economic growth.

In sum, the Bush tax cuts were a bad idea at the time and are an even worse idea today. Ending these cuts for incomes over $250,000 would generate over $100 billion/year in additional revenue. If we also created additional tax rates for very high-income families (e.g. at $500,000, $1,000,000, $5,000,000 and $10,000,000) we could increase federal revenue by more than double that amount and put us on the road to reducing deficits and debts.


NOTE: Barclay worked for 22 years in financial service before retiring in 2004. He is an adjunct professor at the University of Illinois at Chicago in the Liautaud Graduate School of Business and is a member of Wealth for the Common Good. (Copyright (C) 2011 by the American Forum. 6/11)
 
« Previous Blog Entry (June 15, 2011)
 


Your Opinions and Comments
 
The Marcelina Muse  
Dry Tank, TX  
June 23, 2011 9:41am
 
 
Just who controlled congress in those years?
 
 
4th Generation Texan  
Sutherland Springs  
June 18, 2011 1:12pm
 
 
Obviously the composer of this article is one of those far left liberal wingnuts that will distort, tell half truth/lies, leave out vital information, lie, or just plainly ... Read More Read More
 
 
One Voice  
Floresville  
June 17, 2011 6:31am
 
 
This article fails to mention the other side of the coin of the Bush Tax Cuts.
These tax cuts included a huge raise in child tax credit - additional child tax credit and ... Read More Read More
 
 
Alvin Charmaine  
June 16, 2011 4:50pm
 
 
This is stupid. Who's money is it? why the insane need to punish rich people by making them carry more then their share instead of collecting from the 50% that pay zero ... Read More Read More
 
 
Elaine K.  
Floresville  
June 16, 2011 5:58am
 
 
New column posted.
 

Share your comment or opinion on this story!


You must be logged in to post comments:



Other Commentaries



Commentaries
Commentaries page govtrack.us
Commentaries who represents me?

Drama KidsHeavenly Touch homeSacred Heart SchoolWilson's Auto ChooserBlue Moon Karaoke & DJTriple R DC ExpertsChester WilsonAllstate & McBride RealtyVoncille Bielefeld home
  Copyright © 2007-2014 Wilson County News. All rights reserved. Web development by Drewa Designs.