Tuesday, October 13, 2015
1012 C Street  •  Floresville, TX 78114  •  Phone: 830-216-4519  •  Fax: 830-393-3219  • 

WCN Site Search

Lost & Found

Found: Ring during Elmendorf's National Night Out on Tues., Oct. 6 evening. Call Chief Pena at 210-635-8710.
Lost: Chihuahua, black, tan, and white male, "Spy," very small, off F.M. 775, across from the Woodlands on Sept. 26, he is missed dearly. Call 830-391-5055.
Lost: Kitten, 5 months old, Jack disappeared Wed., Oct. 7 from Oak Hill Road, La Vernia, no collar, not neutered. Text/call, 210-464-2486.
More Lost & Found ads ›

Help Wanted

Applications are being accepted for production worker and driver. Apply at American Precast Concrete, 525 10th St., Floresville, between 7 a.m.- 4 p.m. 
The 81st Judicial District Attorney’s office, which includes Frio, La Salle, Atascosa, Karnes and Wilson Counties, is accepting resumes for an Assistant District Attorney position. The selected candidate will manage a specialized caseload with a focus on criminal enterprise, human trafficking/human smuggling and other cases as needed. Responsibilities of the position include working closely with Federal, State and Local law enforcement agencies, felony intake, preparation of cases for grand jury, negotiating pleas, and representation of the State of Texas in pretrial proceedings, as well as in criminal bench trials and jury trials in District Court. All applicants must be a graduate of an accredited law school and licensed to practice law by the State of Texas and have a minimum of five (5) years prosecutorial experience with felony cases and extensive trial experience. Salary commensurate with experience. Resumes will be accepted through the close of business October 19, 2015. Please EMAIL resumes and cover letters to terireyes@81stda.org. DISTRICT ATTORNEY RENE PENA. C/O Teri Reyes, Office Manager, 1327 Third St., Floresville, Texas  78114, fax 830-393-2205. terireyes@81stda.org.
More Help Wanted ads ›

Featured Videos

Video Vault ›


NATO Allies, Not U.S. Taxpayers, Must Bear Brunt of Responsibility & Cost for Libya

E-Mail this Story to a Friend
Print this Story

The author of this entry is responsible for this content, which is not edited by the Wilson County News or wilsoncountynews.com.
U.S. Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison
June 24, 2011 | 1,980 views | 2 comments

After several months of military engagement in Libya, members of both political parties, high-level officials in multiple branches of government, and the American public have raised serious concerns about our involvement in Libya.

One thing is for certain: the military operations in Libya have undoubtedly reinforced and further exposed the weaknesses in the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) alliance. While all members of the 28-nation alliance approved the Libya mission, less than half are participating, and even fewer nations are conducting air-to-ground strike missions.

Since the inception of NATO in 1949, the United States has served as its backbone and provided a major share of the cost in manpower and resources. America has consistently answered the call of our NATO allies when they have needed us, even when there was no clear U.S. interest involved.

NATO is certainly a valuable alliance. But it is increasingly threatened by the complacency of our allies, who are able, but not willing, to shoulder their fair share of the burden. Many NATO members now simply look to the United States and the American taxpayer to pay for their gaps in defense spending.

In Libya, our nation is currently providing the lion’s share of the resources and funding for another NATO mission. We are on track to spend more than $1 billion of U.S. taxpayer dollars this fiscal year on operations involving Libya, an operation that I believe is not in the vital interests of the United States.

With U.S. forces bearing the heavy burden in Iraq and Afghanistan, we should not provide the majority of air, naval, and other resources to support a NATO involvement -- urged by our NATO allies in Europe -- in an open-ended civil war in Libya. Moreover, I believe our NATO allies, who do indeed have a vital interest in the outcome of Libya’s civil war, should be willing to play the lead role in terms of funding and military resources.

On April 21st, Secretary of Defense Robert Gates stated at a press conference, “while it was not a vital interest for us, our allies considered it a vital interest. And just as they have helped us in Afghanistan, we thought it important, the President thought it was important, to help them in Libya.”

The reality is our allies have contributed only a small fraction to the War in Afghanistan. As part of the International Security Assistance Force, which is the command in charge of operations in Afghanistan, the United States is contributing 70 percent of the total force, with 46 nations contributing the remaining 30 percent.

NATO and the Arab League should provide the military and financial assets associated with operations in Libya, just as we are doing in Afghanistan. Of the 28 NATO members, only five exceed the agreed-upon two percent of GDP spending on defense. Two decades after the collapse of the Berlin Wall, the U.S. share of NATO defense spending has now risen, astoundingly, to more than 75%.

As Secretary Gates recently asserted, NATO is turning into a “two-tiered alliance” in which very few members -- except for the United States -- take on the hard-power combat assignments. Instead, the majority of NATO partners limit themselves to non-military roles, such as delivering humanitarian aid.

We are facing a very real and very serious fiscal crisis in our country. It is clear that we can no longer continue to pay for the vast majority of NATO operations, especially those that are not in the vital interest of our nation. America should not only reduce the level of funding we provide to NATO, we should also move to redeploy a large portion of our military presence in Europe back to the United States. I intend to continue fighting to reduce our large overseas military basing presence, to cut spending on the excessive United States military presence in Europe, and to allow more of our troops to be based and trained at home.

Unfortunately, the President’s decision that the U.S. will support the ongoing military operation in Libya sends the message to our European allies that American taxpayers are willing and able to shoulder the burden for their foreign policy and military priorities, and that there are no consequences for the failure of Europeans to do their share. Given our nation’s current financial difficulties, it is imperative that we change that message now.

The American taxpayer can no longer afford to write a blank check for NATO operations. It is time for our allies to shoulder their responsibilities and reduce their dependence on United States military forces.

Kay Bailey Hutchison is the senior U.S. Senator from Texas
‹ Previous Blog Entry

Your Opinions and Comments

The Marcelina Muse  
Dry Tank, TX  
June 24, 2011 4:59pm
Senator, I respectfully point out that the, let the US pay, attitude has been with us for years. Only now with the economic problems we are having has the spotlight been turned on it. Our Congress should have done something about ... More ›

Elaine K.  
June 24, 2011 3:26pm
New column posted.

Share your comment or opinion on this story!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Not a subscriber?
Subscriber, but no password?
Forgot password?

Commentaries Archives

Commentaries page govtrack.us
Commentaries who represents me?
Voncille Bielefeld homeHeavenly Touch homeTriple R DC Expertsauto chooserAllstate & McBride RealtyDrama Kids

  Copyright © 2007-2015 Wilson County News. All rights reserved. Web development by Drewa Designs.