Thursday, August 25, 2016
1012 C Street  •  Floresville, TX 78114  •  Phone: 830-216-4519  •  Fax: 830-393-3219  • 

WCN Site Search


Preview the Paper Preview the Paper

Preview this week's Paper
A limited number of pages are displayed in this preview.
Preview this Week’s Issue ›
Subscribe Today ›

Lost & Found


VideoFound senior female beagle/mix in Whispering Oaks. Blind and deaf. No identification. Call or text 210-259-6977.

VideoLost Shih Tzu, spayed female, Oak Hollow Estates, La Vernia, on Aug. 8, no collar, no microchip, mostly white with black. Reward for information or return. Call or text 580-695-1333.

VideoLOST FEMALE GERMAN SHEPHERD 8/13/16 OAK HOLLOW / HWY 87 LAVERNIA / Mostly black w/ tan on legs / white on chest. Reward for safe return 210-296-1183
More Lost & Found ads ›

Help Wanted

In-home assistance for mom while I work, she has mild to moderate dementia, 2 shifts needed, 1-6 p.m. and 5-11 p.m.; assist with cooking, taking medications, companionship, light duties, position in Floresville. Call 830-379-2291, leave message if interested.
Floresville ISD is accepting applications for the position of Plumber: Must have various construction trades with a minimum of 3 years’ experience. Applications must be submitted on line at www.FISD.us.
More Help Wanted ads ›

Featured Videos





Video Vault ›
Pursch with auto packageShowcase

Breaking News


Appeals court finds Obamacare unconstitutional




E-Mail this Story to a Friend
Print this Story
August 12, 2011, 3:01pm
4,589 views | 19 comments

Federal Appeals Court Rules Health Care Law’s Individual Mandate Unconstitutional
11th Circuit affirms lower court’s ruling striking down the health care law’s individual mandate

AUSTIN -- The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit today affirmed a lower courts ruling and concluded that the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate is unconstitutional. Calling the individual mandate “an unprecedented exercise of congressional power,” the court found that requiring Americans to purchase health insurance “exceeds Congress’ enumerated commerce power.” Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott represented the State of Texas, which is part of the 26-state coalition that filed a legal challenge to the federal law, when the Atlanta-based appeals court held oral arguments in June.

“Obamacare is closer to an end. The federal court of appeals agrees that the federal health care law’s individual mandate violates the U.S. Constitution -- and cannot be enforced against the American people. This is an important ruling for freedom and limited government,” Attorney General Abbott said.
Media links
Opinion of the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

“As we have maintained since before the law was first enacted, the individual mandate exceeds the constitutional limits on Congress’ authority. The federal government cannot rely upon Congress’ power to regulate interstate commerce in a misguided effort to require that every American purchase government-approved health insurance -- whether they want it or not. No public policy goal, no matter how important or well-intentioned, can be allowed to trample the protections and rights guaranteed by our Constitution.”

Under the federal health care law, for the first time in the nation’s history, the federal government is attempting to force individual Americans to enter into contracts and purchase services from private companies -- in this case, insurance companies -- or face a penalty. Attorney General Abbott challenged this so-called individual mandate requirement, explaining that such an imposition on the American people exceeds Congress’ authority and violates Americans’ constitutional rights. Today’s Eleventh Circuit decision agreed with the States’ legal argument, explaining: “...what Congress cannot do under the Commerce Clause is mandate that individuals enter into contracts with private insurance companies for the purchase of an expensive product from the time they are born until the time they die.”

Striking down the unconstitutional individual mandate, the court said that the requirement not only imposes on individuals, but also “imperils our federalist structure.” In light of the overreaching mandate’s unparalleled interference with individual liberty, the court struck down the individual mandate because “the judiciary owes its ultimate deference to the Constitution.”

The bipartisan 26-state coalition currently includes Texas, Florida, South Carolina, Nebraska, Pennsylvania, Louisiana, Washington, Colorado, Michigan, Utah, Alabama, South Dakota, Idaho, Indiana, Mississippi, North Dakota, Arizona, Nevada, Georgia, Alaska, Iowa, Ohio, Kansas, Wyoming, Wisconsin and Maine. The states are joined in this lawsuit by the National Federation of Independent Business, and individual plaintiffs Mary Brown and Kaj Ahlburg.

The multistate lawsuit was filed shortly after President Barack Obama signed the bill into law. The legal action specifically challenges the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and names the U.S. Departments of Health and Human Services, Treasury and Labor as defendants because those federal agencies are charged with implementing the Act’s constitutionally impermissible provisions.

Key Quotes From Today’s Ruling:

“The fact that Congress has never before exercised this supposed authority is telling.”

“If Congress may compel individuals to purchase health insurance from a private company, it may similarly compel the purchase of other products from private industry...”

“Here, it is undisputed that the individual mandate supersedes a multitude of the states’ policy choices in these key areas of traditional state concern.”

“...what Congress cannot do under the Commerce Clause is mandate that individuals enter into contracts with private insurance companies for the purchase of an expensive product from the time they are born until the time they die.”

“It cannot be denied that the individual mandate is an unprecedented exercise of congressional power.”

“The structure of the Constitution interposes obstacles by design, in order to prevent the arrogation of power by one branch or one sovereign.”

“This economic mandate represents a wholly novel and potentially unbounded assertion of congressional authority: the ability to compel Americans to purchase an expensive health insurance product they have elected not to buy, and to make them re-purchase that insurance product every month for their entire lives. We have not found any generally applicable, judicially enforceable limiting principle that would permit us to uphold the mandate without obliterating the boundaries inherent in the system of enumerated congressional powers.”
 

Your Opinions and Comments

 
Senior Citizen  
Wilson County  
August 17, 2011 11:17am
 
Facts, The 22-year-old will have insurance ONLY if the parents can afford or choose to pay for the insurance. Incidently, the rates for individual policies have increased considerably since Obamacare was passed.

 
4th Generation Texan  
Sutherland Springs  
August 17, 2011 9:55am
 
"Facts Only"....Yeah Right! YOU better look at the law. EVERYONE, man, woman, child WILL have insurance which they will have to Pay for. If they DO NOT take out insurance, the Federal Government via IRS will be ... More ›

 
Facts only please  
TX  
August 17, 2011 9:07am
 
Senior Citizen: You do not understand, there will be no change, those who do not have insurance now will not have it in the future, law or no law. At least the 22 year old child with pre-existing medical condition is covered ... More ›

 
Senior Citizen  
Wilson County  
August 17, 2011 7:41am
 
Facts ... so, we just ignore the so-called health care law? It will go away? And, it's not health CARE, that it is addressing. It is health INSURANCE.

 
Facts only please  
TX  
August 17, 2011 6:20am
 
4th Generation Texan what is the penalty? About 600 dollars!! OBTW: The new health law explicitly says that there will be no criminal sanctions for failing to pay the penalty, and no liens or levies on your property. So why ... More ›

 
4th Generation Texan  
Sutherland Springs  
August 16, 2011 11:31am
 
Facts only. Duh! What is the difference between having to buy health insurance and paying a penalty? By paying a penalty, you are declaring that you are a law breaker and YOU HAVE MORE VACANT SPACE IN YOUR BILLFOLD WHERE YOUR ... More ›

 
Facts only please  
TX  
August 16, 2011 10:36am
 
4th Generation Texan: Saying Health Care IS REQUIRED is like saying everyone IS REQUIRED to pay income tax. You can opt out of paying for Health care and pay a penalty. As far as income tax, I know several agencies who conduct ... More ›

 
4th Generation Texan  
Sutherland Springs  
August 16, 2011 9:04am
 
"Rock n"..LOL! Isn't that the way 'EVERYTHING' works? I found your statement that the difference between states requiring auto insurance and Federal requirment to purchase health insurance so extremely broad ... More ›

 
Rock'n chair Rambler  
Over Taxed, TX  
August 16, 2011 8:00am
 
The difference between the State requiring car insurance and the "Congress" requiring health insurance is simply the way the Constitution was written and has been interpreted since it was signed. The States have ... More ›

 
Facts only please  
TX  
August 15, 2011 1:53pm
 
OBTW: So much for the job killer statement. Farley, Robert; Angie Drobnic Holan (January 20, 2011). "The health care law a 'job killer'? The evidence falls short". PolitiFact.com. http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2011/jan/20/eric-cantor/health-care-law-job-killer-evidence-falls-short/. ... More ›

Share your comment or opinion on this story!


You must be logged in to post a comment.




Not a subscriber?
Subscriber, but no password?
Forgot password?

Breaking News Archives


AgriLife Extension to offer programs on Zika, mosquito management in SA (August 24, 2016)
Falls City plans early release for Bruni game Aug. 26 (August 23, 2016)
Most Wanted Fugitive Captured in San Antonio (August 23, 2016)
Watch for signal lights at Standish and Fourth streets (August 23, 2016)
Filing deadline Aug. 25 for Floresville council Place 3, today for other offices (August 22, 2016)
Nixon-Smiley CISD closed first day of school (August 22, 2016)
Rain totals for the week (August 22, 2016)
Overnight flooding causes widespread damage in Wilson County; emergency... (August 21, 2016)
Shelter for flood victims open in Floresville (August 21, 2016)
Poth football scrimmage moved (August 18, 2016)
Counterfeit $20 bills spotted in Floresville (August 17, 2016)
DPS Reminds Drivers to Obey Traffic Laws, Watch For Children As New School... (August 17, 2016)
Weather moves Falls City Aug. 18 scrimmage (August 17, 2016)
Johnny Garcia: One of Texas 10 Most Wanted Fugitives (August 16, 2016)
Flash flood watch issued (August 15, 2016)
Local rain reports (August 15, 2016)
Authorities seek information on vehicle theft (August 11, 2016)
Texas Rangers arrest Nixon city manager (August 11, 2016)
What’s going on? Floresville Police Department closed (August 11, 2016)
Floresville Event Center fire-suppression system fails inspection; city... (August 10, 2016)
Venue change for Rancho de las Cabras film (August 10, 2016)
Police arrest suspect in Nixon armed robbery (August 3, 2016)
Prescribed Burn Planned for Government Canyon State Natural Area Wednesday (August 2, 2016)
WCN Citizens Forum 5/28/15
Malcolm's Custom Welding
Southern Electric
Voncille Bielefeld homeAllstate & McBride RealtyFriesenhahn Custom WeldingTriple R DC ExpertsHeavenly Touch home

  Copyright © 2007-2016 Wilson County News. All rights reserved. Web development by Drewa Designs.