The Big Labor Push
The author of this entry is responsible for this content, which is not edited by the Wilson County News or wilsoncountynews.com.
By Jerry Rogers
President Obama continues to pretend that jobs are his top priority.
His $447 billion jobs bill failed the Senate this past week, so now the White House has promised to push it in bite-sized chunks. At the same time, though, the administration is pushing radical employment policies that are squashing private business, slowing job growth and hampering economic recovery. These efforts must stop.
Consider the shenanigans of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).
A few weeks ago, the NLRB ordered the nation's employers to post a notice by mid-November informing workers about their rights to form a union and bargain collectively. The poster must be prominently displayed, 11" by 17", and posted in multiple languages if more than 20 percent of a company's workforce doesn't speak English.
This dictate grossly exceeds the NLRB's powers under federal law. It also violates employers' First Amendment rights, by forcing them to spend their own money to post NLRB's pro-union message. And it will impact more than more than 6 million companies, mostly small businesses.
Employment is at crisis levels, yet the NLRB sees no problem with imposing new and unnecessary rules on employers.
This is hardly new. The pro-union camp's first shot came in July, when the NLRB issued a formal complaint against the Boeing airline company.
Back in October 2009, that firm opened up a new production line in South Carolina to build its new 787 Dreamliner. Demand for the Dreamliner was far outstripping the production capacity of Boeing's primary facility in Washington state.
The NLRB is taking issue with that investment in South Carolina. The Washington location is unionized. South Carolina's is not -- state workers decertified the International Association of Machinists in September 2009. Regulators claim opening the South Carolina plant is actually a retaliatory move to punish workers at the Washington facility for strikes. Such retaliation, if it occurred, would violate federal law.
Yet there's no evidence that Boeing is punishing anyone. Its Washington line already employs 25,000 unionized workers. The company has not taken steps to cut down on those workers' numbers or hours. The South Carolina facility is simply a much-needed expansion of production capacity.
Nonetheless, the complaint will force Boeing to delay the production of the Dreamliner and ring up huge legal bills. And if the NLRB is actually successful, the South Carolina facility will have to close, throwing an estimated 1,000 people out of work.
Meanwhile, the Department of Labor recently proposed a change in reporting requirements for employers. Currently, firms have to disclose to federal officials any outside consultants they hire to meet with workers and attempt to persuade them not to unionize.
The Labor Department wants to dramatically expand the scope of the disclosure requirement to cover virtually any contact an employer has with a labor relations consultant "regardless of whether or not the consultant has direct contact with workers," as the administration's press release announcing the proposal puts it.
So, for instance, if a company hires a third party just to provide legal advice on union organizing, both management and that consultant would have to file a report with the federal government. That report would have to include a huge amount of information, including fees paid by the employer and the name and billing rate of every other client the consultant works with.
If employers and consultants fail to comply in full, they incur stiff penalties.
An all-encompassing disclosure requirement like this will have a chilling effect on employer speech. The act of exercising their right to be heard during an organizing campaign becomes significantly more costly -- and highly stigmatized.
Just one day after this announcement, the NLRB issued a proposal to shorten the minimum required time period between a union filing for certification and the election among employees that decides the question.
Currently, that period averages about 40 days. The NLRB appears to want to cut it down to 10 to 21. Such a short time frame puts employers at a deep disadvantage. Typically, unions conduct six to eight months' worth of low-profile organizing before officially filing to certify. Managers often don't know workers are considering unionization until the actual filing.
Under the new NLRB rules, employers will be left with at most three weeks to make their case to employees before the vote -- after union bosses taken half a year or more to make theirs.
This administration may claim that it's committed to rectifying the employment crisis. But it seems focused on little more than currying favor with labor unions. Its policies are stifling business growth and preventing job creation, and they're the last thing our nation needs.
Jerry Rogers is president of Capitol Allies and founder of the Six Degrees Project, an independent, nonpartisan effort that promotes entrepreneurship, economic growth, and free-market ideals.
|‹ Previous Blog Entry
Your Opinions and Comments
Rock'n chair Rambler
Over Taxed, TX
October 27, 2011 9:08am
Share your comment or opinion on this story!
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Election 2016 AT STAKE: Your Choices for Medical Care (July 29, 2016)
Facing the Republican giant (July 29, 2016)
Op-Ed about Open Carry (July 28, 2016)
A Penny Mentality In America? (July 21, 2016)
Anyone listening? Church congregations? Let's unite ... (July 17, 2016)
It’s time to stop the nonsense and back Trump (July 15, 2016)
Do black lives really matter? (July 12, 2016)
Eat meat guilt-free (July 11, 2016)
May America find a God-given way (July 8, 2016)
'Extremely Careless' Has Consequences — Usually. (July 7, 2016)
The Economist: Long-Term Growth Seen for Texas Economy (July 6, 2016)
Texas Comptroller Partners with Texas A&M, Sam Houston State University... (July 5, 2016)