Saturday, April 25, 2015
1012 C Street  •  Floresville, TX 78114  •  Phone: 830-216-4519  •  Fax: 830-393-3219  • 

WCN Site Search


Lost & Found

Reward! Black Manx cat (no tail), shy, medium build, "Bear", missing since Oct. 22, we miss him so much! 210-635-7560.
Found: 2 goats on C.R. 434 north of Stockdale, need to find their owners right away. Call to identify, 830-391-1129.
Lost: Australian Shepherd/Border Collie, 7-year-old male, "Sam," tan w/1 brown eye, 1 blue eye, and bad leg, friendly, no collar, since April 12 off C.R. 436, Stockdale. 830-391-4662.
More Lost & Found ads ›

Help Wanted

Service Coordinator, Camino Real Community Services position in Floresville, Texas. Service Coordinator is responsible for service planning, monitoring, assessing and identifying needs and goals for persons with Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities (IDD). Requires Bachelorís degree with a major in social, behavioral or human services. Apply at 1325 3rd Street, Floresville, Texas or submit resume to Camino Real Community Services Center, Attn: HRS, P.O. Box 725, Lytle, TX 78052; Fax 830-772-4304. Visit www.caminorealcs.org for details. EOE. 
Seeking individual to work in a local child-care center, paid holidays, etc., must be high school grad or GED. Apply in person at Cubs Country Childcare, 212 FM 1346 in La Vernia.
More Help Wanted ads ›

Featured Videos





Video Vault ›

National News


Texas Prevails Against EPA




E-Mail this Story to a Friend
Print this Story

Disclaimer:
The author of this entry is responsible for this content, which is not edited by the Wilson County News or wilsoncountynews.com.
March 28, 2012 | 1,314 views | 1 comment

Court Overturns Unlawful Disapproval of State’s Successful Permitting Program

AUSTIN -- Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott issued the following statement regarding the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit’s decision overturning the Environmental Protection Agency’s improper disapproval of Texas’ Pollution Control Project (PCP) Standard Permit:

“Showing seemingly no regard for the federal laws that govern what it can and cannot do, the EPA unlawfully disapproved a commonsense Texas air permitting program that fully complied with the federal Clean Air Act and reduced harmful emissions. The EPA disregarded the limited authority it was granted under federal law and incorrectly alleged that Texas would not act sensibly and in accordance with its own laws. This victory marks the second time in the last three months that Texas has successfully obtained relief from the courts after an unlawful overreach by the EPA.”

The court’s decision explains that the EPA improperly rejected Texas’ PCP Standard Permit more than three years after the agency’s statutory deadline and that the EPA provided no legal basis under the federal Clean Air Act for its disapproval of Texas’ PCP Standard Permit. The court also criticized the EPA for ignoring the federalist system established by the Clean Air Act and disregarding the State’s authority to implement air permitting programs. Under the Clean Air Act, the court pointed out, the EPA is responsible for identifying pollutants and setting national standards, while the states are empowered to create their own unique air quality programs that ensure compliance with federal standards.

Excerpts from the opinion:

“With regard to implementation, the Act confines the EPA to the ministerial function of reviewing SIPs for consistency with the Act’s requirements. This division of responsibility between the states and the federal government ‘reflects the balance of state and federal rights and responsibilities characteristic of our federal system of government.’”

“More than two years after the statutory deadline had passed, the EPA proposed disapproval of Texas’s submission on September 23, 2009. In proposing disapproval of Texas’s PCP Standard Permit, the EPA did not identify any provision of the CAA or its implementing regulations that Texas’s program violated.”

“The Act provides that the EPA ‘shall approve [a SIP] submittal as a whole if it meets all of the applicable requirements of [the Act].’... This statutory imperative leaves the agency no discretion to do anything other than ensure that a state’s submission meets the CAA’s requirements and, if it does, approve it before the passage of its statutory deadline.”

“In this case, the EPA overstepped the bounds of its narrow statutory role in the SIP approval process.”
 
‹ Previous Blog Entry
 

Your Opinions and Comments

 
Elaine K.  
Floresville  
March 28, 2012 1:04pm
 
New post.

Share your comment or opinion on this story!


You must be logged in to post a comment.




Not a subscriber?
Subscriber, but no password?
Forgot password?

National News Archives


Allstate & McBride RealtyTriple R DC ExpertsVoncille Bielefeld homeHeavenly Touch home

  Copyright © 2007-2015 Wilson County News. All rights reserved. Web development by Drewa Designs.