Monday, December 22, 2014
1012 C Street  •  Floresville, TX 78114  •  Phone: 830-216-4519  •  Fax: 830-393-3219  • 

WCN Site Search


Lost & Found

Found: Great Pyrenees in La Vernia. Call or text to claim 830-581-8041.

VideoFound: Cute short legged dog, neutered male, near Wilson County Show Barn, red collar and flea collar, sweet. Call 801-791-0613.

VideoMissing: Kitten from Eagle Creek Subdivision, 9-month-old female, answers to "Sassy," 4-year-old daughter is heartbroken and we greatly miss her. 985-414-8385.
More Lost & Found ads ›

Help Wanted

*Fair Housing notice. All help wanted advertising in this newspaper is subject to the Fair Housing Act which makes it illegal to advertise "any preference limitation or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin, or an intention, to make any such preference limitation or discrimination." This newspaper will not knowingly accept any advertising for help wanted ads, which is in violation of the law. Our readers are hereby informed that all dwellings advertised in this newspaper are available on an equal opportunity basis.
Free line ads! Pay for 3 weeks when you place your ad and receive one week free. $8 for 20 words or less, 10¢ each add'l word. Credit card or electronic check processing. 830-216-4519.
More Help Wanted ads ›

Featured Videos





Video Vault ›

National News


Texas Prevails Against EPA




E-Mail this Story to a Friend
Print this Story

Disclaimer:
The author of this entry is responsible for this content, which is not edited by the Wilson County News or wilsoncountynews.com.
March 28, 2012 | 1,267 views | 1 comment

Court Overturns Unlawful Disapproval of State’s Successful Permitting Program

AUSTIN -- Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott issued the following statement regarding the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit’s decision overturning the Environmental Protection Agency’s improper disapproval of Texas’ Pollution Control Project (PCP) Standard Permit:

“Showing seemingly no regard for the federal laws that govern what it can and cannot do, the EPA unlawfully disapproved a commonsense Texas air permitting program that fully complied with the federal Clean Air Act and reduced harmful emissions. The EPA disregarded the limited authority it was granted under federal law and incorrectly alleged that Texas would not act sensibly and in accordance with its own laws. This victory marks the second time in the last three months that Texas has successfully obtained relief from the courts after an unlawful overreach by the EPA.”

The court’s decision explains that the EPA improperly rejected Texas’ PCP Standard Permit more than three years after the agency’s statutory deadline and that the EPA provided no legal basis under the federal Clean Air Act for its disapproval of Texas’ PCP Standard Permit. The court also criticized the EPA for ignoring the federalist system established by the Clean Air Act and disregarding the State’s authority to implement air permitting programs. Under the Clean Air Act, the court pointed out, the EPA is responsible for identifying pollutants and setting national standards, while the states are empowered to create their own unique air quality programs that ensure compliance with federal standards.

Excerpts from the opinion:

“With regard to implementation, the Act confines the EPA to the ministerial function of reviewing SIPs for consistency with the Act’s requirements. This division of responsibility between the states and the federal government ‘reflects the balance of state and federal rights and responsibilities characteristic of our federal system of government.’”

“More than two years after the statutory deadline had passed, the EPA proposed disapproval of Texas’s submission on September 23, 2009. In proposing disapproval of Texas’s PCP Standard Permit, the EPA did not identify any provision of the CAA or its implementing regulations that Texas’s program violated.”

“The Act provides that the EPA ‘shall approve [a SIP] submittal as a whole if it meets all of the applicable requirements of [the Act].’... This statutory imperative leaves the agency no discretion to do anything other than ensure that a state’s submission meets the CAA’s requirements and, if it does, approve it before the passage of its statutory deadline.”

“In this case, the EPA overstepped the bounds of its narrow statutory role in the SIP approval process.”
 
« Previous Blog Entry (March 27, 2012)
 


Your Opinions and Comments

 
Elaine K.  
Floresville  
March 28, 2012 1:04pm
 
 
New post.
 

Share your comment or opinion on this story!


You must be logged in to post comments:



Other National News

Blue Moon Karaoke & DJTriple R DC ExpertsEast Central Driving SchoolAllstate & McBride RealtyVoncille Bielefeld homeChester WilsonHeavenly Touch home

  Copyright © 2007-2014 Wilson County News. All rights reserved. Web development by Drewa Designs.