Wednesday, December 7, 2016
1012 C Street  •  Floresville, TX 78114  •  Phone: 830-216-4519  •  Fax: 830-393-3219  • 

WCN Site Search

Preview the Paper Preview the Paper

Preview this week's Paper
A limited number of pages are displayed in this preview.
Preview this Week’s Issue ›
Subscribe Today ›

Lost & Found

VideoPlease help me find my dog. His name is Archie and was last seen on black jack road. My contact information is,210.919.0183
Found: Red Chihuahua, male, friendly but frightened, need to find his owner, in Floresville. 830-534-6413.

Videomissing black lab. please return small cash reward. no questions asked. his family miss him very much 2818256707.
More Lost & Found ads ›

Help Wanted

Dean & Peeler Meatworks Custom Butchery in Poth, Texas will be opening in early 2017 and is searching for a head butcher and qualified meat cutters. This will be a cattle only federally inspected facility focusing on full high quality fabrication for customers and private labels. Those individuals interested contact us at 806-789-6359 or email
Gate keeper needed at Braunig Lake. Call 210-635-8289.
More Help Wanted ads ›

Featured Videos

Video Vault ›


A Flax Tax Lesson from Mexico

E-Mail this Story to a Friend
Print this Story

The author of this entry is responsible for this content, which is not edited by the Wilson County News or
May 29, 2012 | 2,629 views | 20 comments

By Roberto Salinas-León

With tax season finally behind us, now's an ideal time for policymakers to reform America's tax code. With the absurd complexity of the U.S. tax system is still fresh in everyone's mind, there's certainly political will for such a move.

One of the most popular ideas is the flat tax -- a uniform rate applied to all income, without exemptions, deductions, or special favors. The flat-tax approach could apply to individual incomes taxes as well as to taxes on businesses.

The flax tax is a bold idea, which has caught on in many so-called emerging markets. Done right, it could revitalize America's economy. But my home country of Mexico serves as a cautionary tale for what can go wrong when policymakers try to exploit the flat tax as just another instrument to enhance tax revenues.

In Mexico, the unhappy experience centered on business taxes. In January 2008, thanks in large part to the leadership of President Felipe Calderon, Mexico installed a national 16.5 percent flat tax -- officially known as the "IETU" -- on all corporate earnings. It was eventually adjusted upwards to 17.5 percent, which is the current rate.

The problems that inspired Mexico's IETU are similar to those plaguing the American system. Mexico's code was riddled with an absurd number of deductions and special-interest carve-outs.

Tax code complexity generates massive compliance costs that leave businesses with fewer resources to put toward genuinely productive activities. In Mexico, code compliance expenses involve a transaction cost of almost 2 percent of GDP.

In the United States, citizens spend over 6 billion hours annually filling out tax forms. Research from the Laffer Center shows that for every dollar collected by the IRS, taxpayers incur an additional 30 cents in compliance costs, totaling $431 billion every year.

In Mexico as in the United States, large corporations have the resources and the (perverse) incentive to exploit complexities in the tax code to reduce their taxes. In Mexico, while the official corporate marginal tax rate was 30 percent, many businesses routinely finagled their burden down to as low as 6 percent "effective" tax rate.

To get a sense of the size of that same problem in America, just consider that General Electric paid precisely zero percent in taxes on net income in 2009 and 2010.

Done right, the IETU would have transformed the Mexican economy, radically simplifying tax compliance and getting rid of mountains of existing loopholes. But something went wrong between conception and implementation.

By the time President Calderon obtained congressional approval and signed the bill into law, it looked wildly different from the ambitious conception of the flat tax.

Policymakers, obsessed only with tax revenue, started tinkering -- and then tinkered and tinkered some more, to the point that the final law actually made the country's tax code far worse. Instead of a simple, straightforward rate on earnings, businesses got handed yet another bundle of complexities in calculating and complying with tax obligations.

Indeed, the worst mutation by far was that instead of replacing the old, broken corporate income tax system, the IETU was introduced as an alternative to compete with it. Every year, businesses now have to tally up how much they owe under both the old corporate rate (with countless of deductions) and the flat tax alternative -- and then, by law, are supposed to pay the higher amount.

Shockingly, instead of using a simple idea to simplify life, the government managed to increase compliance costs. Businesses have to hire double the lawyers and accountants every tax season, leaving even less time and money for productive activities, and making it all the more likely that they might decide to just avoid paying taxes entirely. Tax evasion today represents almost 40 percent of all (non-oil) tax revenues collected!

The IETU was conceived as a way of streamlining the tax code in order to spur business growth and make Mexico more accommodating to investment. But politicians morphed it into a brazen money grab. The law that President Calderon signed is nothing like what flat tax advocates were originally hoping for. In the process, the very idea of a flat tax has unwittingly gotten a bad rap.

American policymakers need to avoid our mistakes. The U.S. tax code needs to be simplified. There could soon be the political will for installing a national, uniform flat rate. When legislators go about writing that rate into law, though, they must keep it pure and simple -- and fight back against any special-interest scheming to recreate the costly and inefficient rules of the past.

Roberto Salinas-León is the president of the Mexico Business Forum.
‹ Previous Blog Entry

Your Opinions and Comments

One Voice  
June 1, 2012 5:32pm
To implement a new taxing system - we need to dump all the politicians. I mean all. I come to that conclusion by simply looking at their track records. Next - do away with all these insane government jobs. In other words... More ›

June 1, 2012 5:09pm
I believe that all income should be taxed. The rates should be set based on the amount needed to fund a reduced government and start paying down our debt. Even if the low income person pays only one or two percent, it would... More ›

The Marcelina Muse  
Dry Tank, TX  
June 1, 2012 3:33pm
There would have to be a mechanism within the sales tax law to allow for refund of most of the tax if the taxpayers income is below a certain amount, perhaps an amount equal to the maximum SS retirement benefit. This would not... More ›

June 1, 2012 10:42am apology.....I assume that since your national sales tax proposal would tax all persons on social security, you are not against taxing all persons on social security regardless of what the tax is called. Am I... More ›

The Marcelina Muse  
Dry Tank, TX  
June 1, 2012 10:09am
Grouch you should not put words in other peoples mouths. I did not say that I was against taxing SS benefits on high income level folks. The original intent of SS as far as I know was to assist lower income level folks. Of course,... More ›

June 1, 2012 10:02am
Clarification.....the total amount of money cited as received from Social Security is in 2012 dollars.

May 31, 2012 3:16pm
Muse and One Voice.....You both support a national sales tax which would impact persons on social security but are outraged about income taxes on social security benefits for certain income level folks. That sorta strikes... More ›

May 31, 2012 1:03pm
One Voice.......I pay taxes on a portion of my Social Security but I could avoid them by making less money. I also pay income tax on my military retirement pay which I don't mind. I believe that all income should be taxed... More ›

One Voice  
May 31, 2012 12:22pm
Muse - we are on the same page. What is completely insane is - if a MFJ makes over a certain amount (I believe this year it was $32,000.00 - that will include 50% of their SS check).. These elderly get taxed on their SS. Just... More ›

Publius Valerius Publicola  
Rome, Tx.  
May 31, 2012 12:02pm
The selfish mental attitude of "do away with all the loopholes and exemptions except mine" is part of what got us into this financial morass in the first place. Face facts folks, if this Nation is to survive as a... More ›

Share your comment or opinion on this story!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Not a subscriber?
Subscriber, but no password?
Forgot password?

Commentaries Archives

Commentaries page
Commentaries who represents me?
Triple R DC ExpertsVoncille Bielefeld homeAllstate & McBride RealtyHeavenly Touch homeFriesenhahn Custom Welding

  Copyright © 2007-2016 Wilson County News. All rights reserved. Web development by Drewa Designs.