You’ve been granted free access to this subscribers only article.
Editorial: Austerity, family, the economy
By Rob Schwarzwalder
When the Left takes a strident position on any given issue, that’s a clear signal that the policy they dislike is gaining momentum.
Take the recent liberal apoplexy over reducing the size and scope of government, it is often summarized as “austerity.” People in nations around the world, from Greece to Spain to the United States, are bearing the brunt of massive overspending by those they have elected.
Reducing this spending and the dependency on government it has created -- even by the most passive means, such as reducing the growth rate of government outflows -- is giving liberal writers the vapors.
Joel Brinkley, formerly of the New York Times and now a journalism prof at Stanford, tells us that “imposing austerity now is utterly foolhardy -- in fact, just plain stupid.” Nobel Prize winner Paul Krugman writes that while “Fortunately ... there was some ‘passive’ fiscal tightening as the Obama stimulus faded out, but no wholesale shift to austerity.” And former Secretary of Labor in the Clinton administration Robert Reich (now a professor of public policy at UC-Berkeley) calls for “rejecting austerity economics for now, while at the same time demanding that corporations and the rich pay their fair share of the cost of keeping everyone else afloat.”
To summarize, in the words of Stanford economist John Taylor, “The proposals called ‘austerity’ are characterized (by the Left) as going back to the Stone Age, with the connotation of drastic, draconian, sharp, sudden reductions in spending.” Why these hysterical and near-panicked characterizations? Because Left-leaning economists recognize, as
even Reich admits, “America has a long-term budget deficit that’s scary. So does Europe.” As a result, they know that policymakers and those who elect them are at last grappling with the hard choices needed to rein in Washington’s spending.
The consequences of continued fiscal profligacy are profound. Michael Cembalest, chairman of market and investment strategy for J.P. Morgan Asset Management, wrote recently in Forbes, “Financial markets remain concerned about the ability and willingness of the U.S. and Europe to tackle their respective fiscal challenges ... Downgrades, government shutdown rumors and political impasse on deficit reduction have not lost their ability to negatively affect equity markets, business activity and confidence.”
In layman’s language, this means that unless Western governments -- led by our own -- take steps to curb the growth rate of spending and reduce outlays in areas where calamitous overspending is obvious (e.g., archaically formulated entitlement programs), any nascent recovery will collapse.
Shawn Tully, a senior editor at large at Fortune magazine, argues that “lowering spending right now -- as long as the downward slope is gradual -- will do nothing to choke economic growth, and could even enhance it. And the anti-austerity solution, raising spending immediately, then reversing course at some future date, will not lift GDP, even temporarily, and threatens to further hobble deeply indebted nations.”
As Tully goes on to note, “The distinguished crowd that condemns austerity champions more spending instead. Once again, the extra dollars need to come from somewhere else. If they’re borrowed at home, they lower private investment. If they’re borrowed from abroad, they lower exports or raise imports.”
Increasing federal spending and raising taxes on any person or business doing even modestly well is a sure-fire way of forestalling the growth America’s economy and her families so urgently need.
To foster growth, we can lower the rate of federal spending, modernize entitlement programs, provide appropriate tax incentives for firms to expand and hire, and liberate business from undue regulations. Most importantly, we can and must strengthen that single most significant engine of economic productivity, the family.
Family dissolution erodes economic growth, and the sharp decline in population growth has a negative effect on productivity. “Human capital and labor combined with physical capital each contribute roughly equal parts to growth,” write Drs. Pat Fagan and Henry Potrykus of the Marriage and Religion Research Institute. “Increasingly it has been hoped by many that physical capital may substitute for any decline in population’s and human capital’s contribution to growth. However, this has not been attained historically.”
Elsewhere, they have written, “Government revenues come from the taxation of our economy. Our economic growth is and will continue to be a fraction of that of the pre-1960s era because of the breakdown in marriage. All the while, more citizens are pushed into dependency on this government, again because of marriage breakdown.”
Marriage. Children. Family. Economic growth. Fiscal discipline and spending reduction. All are indispensable ingredients to the professed goal of both Right and Left: Prosperity.
Rob Schwarzwalder is executive vice president at the Family Research Council. He has served as chief of staff for two members of Congress, a communications aide in both the House and Senate, and as director of communications and senior writer at the National Association of Manufacturers. He has also served as president of Ravi Zacharias International Ministries.
Your Opinions and Comments
Be the first to comment on this story!
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Section A: General News Archives
Brownlow: Little chance ‘fracking’ could hurt water (September 2, 2015)
City’s proposed budget, property taxes raise questions (September 2, 2015)
County Commisioners ‘buckle up’ on $24M budget (September 2, 2015)
Court Update (September 2, 2015)
De Leon family sells Olivia’s San Antonio location (September 2, 2015)
Distracted driving program new requirement for teens (September 2, 2015)
Editorial: Coca-Cola to obese people: Hey, exercise more! (September 2, 2015)
Editorial: How will voters sort through all the candidates? (September 2, 2015)
Editorial: Libs: Symbols mean something — unless we disagree (September 2, 2015)
Floresville awards contract for event center repairs (September 2, 2015)
Floresville elections take twists (September 2, 2015)
Floresville struggles to ‘play ball’ (September 2, 2015)
Free webinar series for small businesses (September 2, 2015)
From student job to interim manager (September 2, 2015)
Karnes airport gets $2.1M in funding (September 2, 2015)
Labor Day office closures (September 2, 2015)
Letter: Karnes County officials continue spending (September 2, 2015)
Letter: Urgent: Nix Iran deal (September 2, 2015)
Letter: Voter ID thumbprint (September 2, 2015)
Make your way to Feather Fest (September 2, 2015)
MedDropSA is Sept. 5 (September 2, 2015)
Meeting Watch: East Central ISD (September 2, 2015)
Oscar Mayer issues recall (September 2, 2015)
Paid firefighters could aid La Vernia volunteers (September 2, 2015)
Police Blotter (September 2, 2015)
Register to compete in Adult Literacy challenge (September 2, 2015)
Relay committee to meet Sept. 8 (September 2, 2015)
SARA approves study of Floresville’s River Park (September 2, 2015)
Sponsors needed for Conversation with Constitution event (September 2, 2015)
Stockdale council approves $2.07M 2015-16 budget (September 2, 2015)
Substitute teacher training dates set (September 2, 2015)
TEA lauds Falls City, Poth (September 2, 2015)
The best medicine (September 2, 2015)
VA cuts backlog (September 2, 2015)
Welcome back! (September 2, 2015)