You’ve been granted free access to this subscribers only article.
Will downer numbers rise as tagging begins?
Wilson County NewsJuly 11, 2012 | 3,794 views | 1 comment
SAN MARCOS -- Since the state animal health officials lifted the testing of cattle brucellosis at the auction barns, the number of downer cattle -- cattle that have difficulty standing -- has greatly declined. Now with the proposed animal disease traceability program -- requiring the tagging of all adult cattle -- this scenario could change.
Livestock associations have supported the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service animal identification version pertaining to the use of back tags for animals being sent directly to slaughter, but the amendment fell on deaf ears when it came to the state’s identification program.
Prior to the Independent Cattlemen’s Association of Texas (ICA) annual convention in San Marcos June 20-22, the ICA distributed an email to its members, stating that the Texas Animal Health Commission adopted the traceability rules on June 6. The amendment the groups supported was not included in the final rules, however.
According to the June 15 ICA email, “Older cattle moving directly to slaughter need to avoid being placed in a chute and having a metal tag put in their ear. This practice would have eliminated many injuries, bruises, and additional stress placed on these cattle. Animal Disease Traceability would have been accomplished through the use of market back tags. Unfortunately, this amendment was defeated by a majority vote of the TAHC [Texas Animal Health Commission] Commissioners.”
Last fall, cattlemen were given the chances to voice their concerns regarding the ID program. ICA Executive Director Bill Hyman addressed this concern in an Oct. 19 interview.
“Along with LMAT [Livestock Marketing Association of Texas], the adult cattle going to slaughter are the bulk of the adult cattle sale. They are identified with a USDA back tag,” Hyman said. “The proposed tagging rules written by USDA also support the use of back tags to identify adult cattle destined for slaughter, both inside the state and between states.”
During the ICA convention, the directors approved a proclamation June 21, seeking a change for the program that supports the use of market back tags. See “Resolution” for the ICA’s stance.
Cattlemen had the opportunity to listen to Dr. Dee Ellis, state veterinarian with the Texas Animal Health Commission, June 22. A couple of cattlemen questioned this regulation and the extra paperwork auction barns will have to retain, since the auction barn must keep a listing of the tag numbers distributed during each sale.
The questions are due to the USDA Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service’s Animal Disease Traceability Program’s anticipated release in July or August. In the USDA version, auction barns must keep records for five years.
According to the Aug. 11, 2011, Federal Register, “This proposed rule would require that any ... person or entity who distributes official identification devices maintain for a minimum of 5 years a record of the names and addresses of anyone to whom the devices were distributed.”
Ellis said if an animal is properly tagged, then the animal need not be placed in a chute, and the state inspector will allow the animal to continue into the auction ring. If the animal does not have the required tag, then the animal must be tagged according to law.
Ellis explained that the reason for not allowing the use of back tags is due to heads at slaughter being unidentifiable, due to a lack of some sort of identification. In the event of a disease outbreak, the agency could not trace back the proper owner.
“We have a traceability problem in Texas,” Ellis said.
He said the agency is willing to work with the producers and auction barns to modify the rules.
Traceability or origin?
While the debate continues on the use of tags for animals to be sent directly to slaughter, another question relates to the language used in the rules.
According to the Texas Animal Health Commission literature, “If there is a need to trace a particular tag, animal health officials will contact the owner who received the tag series and ask for information on the animal to which the tag was applied.”
If one considers that the average steer in the United States now has eight owners during its lifetime, with the consumer being No. 8, will all former owners be contacted, since the Animal Health Commission will ask for data from the place where the tag was applied? If the rancher is not required to keep records, how will the rancher know which animal was sold with a certain number? Is this program to trace animals for disease, or a program to trace the origin of the animal (site where the initial animal was tagged)?
Time will tell if more paperwork will be required to address animal disease traceability, and at what cost to the producer.
Your Opinions and Comments
Share your comment or opinion on this story!
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Agriculture Today Archives
Bermuda grass stem maggot spreads in Texas (July 29, 2015)
Floresville FFA members receive degrees, Walrath scholarship (July 29, 2015)
Hay & Forage Report (July 29, 2015)
Livestock Market Reports (July 29, 2015)
Roses suffer from heat (July 29, 2015)
Senate, House spending bills signal support for industry (July 29, 2015)
TDA Market Report (July 29, 2015)
Texas farmer to lead corn group (July 29, 2015)
Time to prepare for hurricane season (July 29, 2015)
‘Where Does Our Food Come From?’ (July 29, 2015)
Crow is 15th in the nation (July 22, 2015)
Have you seen a Texas horned lizard? (July 22, 2015)
Hay & Forage Report (July 22, 2015)
Landscaping picks (July 22, 2015)
Livestock Market Reports (July 22, 2015)
Offices issue receipts (July 22, 2015)
Recent rains — fewer grasshoppers! (July 22, 2015)
Stallman announces departure in January (July 22, 2015)
TDA Market Report (July 22, 2015)
Benefits of the Chinese pistache (July 15, 2015)
Cattle market outlook, trends short course (July 15, 2015)
Conservation assistance online for landowners, users (July 15, 2015)
Crouch Memorial Bull Riding is July 25 (July 15, 2015)
Hay & Forage Report (July 15, 2015)
Livestock Market Reports (July 15, 2015)
Mischief-maker transforms into equine world champion (July 15, 2015)
TDA Market (July 15, 2015)
Wardens investigate alligator attack (July 15, 2015)
Ag-Pro continues John Deere tradition (July 8, 2015)
Cattlemen, Floresville FFA unite (July 8, 2015)
Hay & Forage Report (July 8, 2015)
Livestock Market Reports (July 8, 2015)
Locals attend conference (July 8, 2015)
Much of peach crop excellent quality, quantity (July 8, 2015)
Nomination period open for farm committee (July 8, 2015)
TDA Market Report (July 8, 2015)
Things farmers do when it rains (July 8, 2015)
Two-part water conservation landscaping workshop in SA (July 8, 2015)
U.S. cattle herd safety threatened by Brazilian beef importation? (July 8, 2015)
West Nile virus vaccine in horses (July 8, 2015)
Will new driveway affect live oak? (July 8, 2015)
Hay & Forage Report (July 1, 2015)
July 2015 Gardening Calendar (July 1, 2015)
Livestock Market Reports (July 1, 2015)
Native anaqua is a tasty treat for wildlife (July 1, 2015)
TDA Market Report (July 1, 2015)
Texas railway raises concerns on eminent domain (July 1, 2015)
Third time's a charm for Buck Taylor roping (July 1, 2015)