Wilson County News
Commentaries header
Wilson County News • 1012 C St • Floresville • TX • 78114 • Ph: 830-216-4519 • Fax: 830-393-3219 • Email:
Friday, Apr 18, 2014
Login
Not a subscriber? Click here.
Are you a WCN subscriber?
Set up your password.

 
E-Mail
Password
  Remember me
 
  Forgot password?
La Vernia News
Google
Google

Preview the Paper
Preview this week's Paper

Commentaries

A Better Way to Protect Social Security




E-Mail this Story to a Friend
Print this Story

Disclaimer:
The author of this entry is responsible for this content, which is not edited by the Wilson County News or wilsoncountynews.com.
U.S. Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison
December 17, 2012 | 1026 views | 14 comments

Going over the fiscal cliff on January 1st would mean huge income tax increases for all Americans and across-the-board cuts in most federal programs (except Social Security). I believe Congress and the White House will do all that must be done to avoid such a shock to our economy.

But the reason for the fiscal cliff -- an exploding national debt -- won’t go away until Congress and the White House reach agreement on a long-term deficit-reduction solution. Although there are differences over the details, there is broad agreement in Washington that this should consist of comprehensive, pro-growth tax reform and common-sense spending reforms that include shoring up the finances of Social Security and other entitlement programs.

More than 60 percent of current federal spending goes to entitlement programs, mostly Social Security and Medicare. To put that in perspective, if we eliminated all federal spending except entitlements -- that is, if we spent no money on highways, national defense, medical research, food safety, etc. -- this year’s federal budget would be just barely balanced and would not affect the debt at all.

In a few more years, eliminating all non-entitlement spending wouldn’t be enough to balance the budget. That’s because both Social Security and Medicare costs will grow faster than our economy for the next several decades, as the largest generation in our nation’s history gets ready to retire. At the same time, there are fewer Americans in the workforce to contribute payroll taxes to cover those benefits.

Some have pointed out that both programs are financed by payroll taxes and have accumulated surpluses in previous decades (essentially IOUs from the U.S. Treasury). But payroll taxes no longer cover the costs of benefits, and surpluses are dwindling. The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) currently estimates a payroll tax shortfall in Social Security of $59 billion in 2012, $76 billion in 2013, and $86 billion for both 2014 and 2015.

Social Security’s situation is on course to run out of money for full retirement benefits in 2033. Although that seems a long way off, waiting until then to address Social Security’s finances probably would require a big payroll tax increase or a cut in benefits -- or both. But modest, incremental changes over the next few years will protect benefits for current retirees and for those who are about to retire, as well as preserving Social Security for the next generation.

I have put forth a plan, the Defend and Save Social Security Act, to preserve and strengthen Social Security. My approach is sensible, fair, and easy to implement.

First, as Americans live longer, it makes sense to increase the retirement age gradually -- without impacting those who are about to retire. Under my bill, anyone who is currently 59 years or older would not be affected.

For everyone else, both the normal retirement age and early retirement age would increase by three months each year, starting in 2016. That means the normal retirement age would reach 67 by 2019, 68 by 2023, 69 by 2027, and 70 by 2031. The early retirement age would also be gradually increased to 63 by 2019 and 64 by 2023.

Second, the annual cost-of-living adjustment, or COLA, would be computed as it is under current law. However, my bill would shave off 1 percent of the COLA in any year it exceeded 1 percent. (If an annual COLA adjustment is less than 1 percent, there would be no change.)

Social Security’s Chief Actuary calculates that my legislation would ensure full retirement benefits for at least 50 years -- as well as reducing deficits by $631 billion over the next 10 years.

In its current form, Social Security is headed for insolvency. The question isn’t whether to act, it’s when. I believe it is better to act now, while there is time to gradually implement changes, over the course of several years, rather than suffering a massive disruption to the program all at once. By doing this, there would be no cuts in Social Security’s core benefits and no payroll tax increase on workers today.

Hutchison, a Republican, is the senior U.S. senator from Texas.
 
« Previous Blog Entry (December 14, 2012)
 


Your Opinions and Comments
 
PRAIRIE GROUCH  
GRAND PRAIRIE TX  
December 22, 2012 5:52am
 
 
Alvin....Are you forgetting that Social Security
is a form of insurance in addition to a supplemental
retirement program ? So, is it your contention that
after paying ... Read More Read More
 
 
Alvin Charmaine  
December 22, 2012 2:53am
 
 
Prairie it isnt greedy to not want to support someone else for the rest of their life. When people who have never worked can live off the govt for there whole lives there ... Read More Read More
 
 
PRAIRIE GROUCH  
GRAND PRAIRIE TX  
December 21, 2012 6:12pm
 
 
Hey Alvin.....You sound like Simon Legree....cutting
off widow benefits and all that.....Did you decorate
Tom's cabin this holiday season. Merry Christmas.
 
 
PRAIRIE GROUCH  
GRAND PRAIRIE TX  
December 21, 2012 11:43am
 
 
Rabble Rouser..It stays in the Social Security trust
fund. I guess it sorta balances out for those who
live longer than expected and survivor benefits.
Publicola.....Nice ... Read More Read More
 
 
Publius Valerius Publicola  
Rome, Tx.  
December 21, 2012 10:55am
 
 
How about this dream. Replace income tax with a national sales tax, everyone pays. No benefits at all for illegals. All politicians retire with only social security benefits ... Read More Read More
 
 
Rabble Rouser Extraordinaire  
Adkins, TX  
December 21, 2012 10:29am
 
 
So what or where exactly does the [SS] money go if...

A person works for 40 years paying into SS, OASDI, etc., and he passes away before he draws a red cent? ... Read More Read More
 
 
squawk box  
Pandora, Tx  
December 20, 2012 5:08pm
 
 
Ex-Tiger......Taxing the rich......It's sorta like
when they asked Willie Sutton why he robbed banks
and received the answer of "that's where the money is."
Our ... Read More Read More
 
 
PRAIRIE GROUCH  
GRAND PRAIRIE TX  
December 20, 2012 7:58am
 
 
Ex Tiger......There is no so called "lock box". This
notion of a social security box of cash was just an
Al Gore hoax and political stunt. Social Security ... Read More Read More
 
 
Ex-Tiger  
CA  
December 20, 2012 6:54am
 
 
If we are trying to reduce the national debt, does it make sense to raise taxes on only two percent of the population who makes over 250,000 or do we make the 46% of Americans ... Read More Read More
 
 
PRAIRIE GROUCH  
GRAND PRAIRIE TX  
December 19, 2012 1:06pm
 
 
Alvin....During the first half of my working career,
it wasn't uncommon to reach your required FICA around
the start of the 3rd quarter. Of course the caps on
FICA were ... Read More Read More
 

Share your comment or opinion on this story!


You must be logged in to post comments:



Other Commentaries


Commentaries
Commentaries page govtrack.us
Commentaries who represents me?
 
^Top
  Copyright © 2014 Wilson County News. All rights reserved. Web development by Drewa Designs.
^Top