Sunday, November 29, 2015
1012 C Street  •  Floresville, TX 78114  •  Phone: 830-216-4519  •  Fax: 830-393-3219  • 

WCN Site Search

Lost & Found

VideoLost: Chocolate Lab, female, named Linda, from Abrego Lake Subdivision. Text/call if spotted or found, 916-508-6024.
Found: Military dog tag at Wal-mart fuel station, name on tag is Perez Lilliana. If you are or know this person, call Felix 830-391-3003 to claim.
Lost: Male dog, looks like Pit Bull, white w/brown freckles, green eyes, "Shelby," last seen morning of Nov. 18, 1604 between New Sulphur Springs and Jim Terrill Rd. 210-389-9047.
More Lost & Found ads ›

Help Wanted

*Fair Housing notice. All help wanted advertising in this newspaper is subject to the Fair Housing Act which makes it illegal to advertise "any preference limitation or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin, or an intention, to make any such preference limitation or discrimination." This newspaper will not knowingly accept any advertising for help wanted ads, which is in violation of the law. Our readers are hereby informed that all dwellings advertised in this newspaper are available on an equal opportunity basis.
The San Antonio River Authority is looking for highly qualified individuals for the Riparian Technician position. High School Diploma/GED required plus 1 year experience in operation and maintenance of landscape or agricultural equipment. We offer a great benefit package for employees. If interested, apply at for more information.
More Help Wanted ads ›

Featured Videos

Video Vault ›


A Better Way to Protect Social Security

E-Mail this Story to a Friend
Print this Story

The author of this entry is responsible for this content, which is not edited by the Wilson County News or
U.S. Sen. Kay Bailey Hutchison
December 17, 2012 | 1,395 views | 14 comments

Going over the fiscal cliff on January 1st would mean huge income tax increases for all Americans and across-the-board cuts in most federal programs (except Social Security). I believe Congress and the White House will do all that must be done to avoid such a shock to our economy.

But the reason for the fiscal cliff -- an exploding national debt -- won’t go away until Congress and the White House reach agreement on a long-term deficit-reduction solution. Although there are differences over the details, there is broad agreement in Washington that this should consist of comprehensive, pro-growth tax reform and common-sense spending reforms that include shoring up the finances of Social Security and other entitlement programs.

More than 60 percent of current federal spending goes to entitlement programs, mostly Social Security and Medicare. To put that in perspective, if we eliminated all federal spending except entitlements -- that is, if we spent no money on highways, national defense, medical research, food safety, etc. -- this year’s federal budget would be just barely balanced and would not affect the debt at all.

In a few more years, eliminating all non-entitlement spending wouldn’t be enough to balance the budget. That’s because both Social Security and Medicare costs will grow faster than our economy for the next several decades, as the largest generation in our nation’s history gets ready to retire. At the same time, there are fewer Americans in the workforce to contribute payroll taxes to cover those benefits.

Some have pointed out that both programs are financed by payroll taxes and have accumulated surpluses in previous decades (essentially IOUs from the U.S. Treasury). But payroll taxes no longer cover the costs of benefits, and surpluses are dwindling. The non-partisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO) currently estimates a payroll tax shortfall in Social Security of $59 billion in 2012, $76 billion in 2013, and $86 billion for both 2014 and 2015.

Social Security’s situation is on course to run out of money for full retirement benefits in 2033. Although that seems a long way off, waiting until then to address Social Security’s finances probably would require a big payroll tax increase or a cut in benefits -- or both. But modest, incremental changes over the next few years will protect benefits for current retirees and for those who are about to retire, as well as preserving Social Security for the next generation.

I have put forth a plan, the Defend and Save Social Security Act, to preserve and strengthen Social Security. My approach is sensible, fair, and easy to implement.

First, as Americans live longer, it makes sense to increase the retirement age gradually -- without impacting those who are about to retire. Under my bill, anyone who is currently 59 years or older would not be affected.

For everyone else, both the normal retirement age and early retirement age would increase by three months each year, starting in 2016. That means the normal retirement age would reach 67 by 2019, 68 by 2023, 69 by 2027, and 70 by 2031. The early retirement age would also be gradually increased to 63 by 2019 and 64 by 2023.

Second, the annual cost-of-living adjustment, or COLA, would be computed as it is under current law. However, my bill would shave off 1 percent of the COLA in any year it exceeded 1 percent. (If an annual COLA adjustment is less than 1 percent, there would be no change.)

Social Security’s Chief Actuary calculates that my legislation would ensure full retirement benefits for at least 50 years -- as well as reducing deficits by $631 billion over the next 10 years.

In its current form, Social Security is headed for insolvency. The question isn’t whether to act, it’s when. I believe it is better to act now, while there is time to gradually implement changes, over the course of several years, rather than suffering a massive disruption to the program all at once. By doing this, there would be no cuts in Social Security’s core benefits and no payroll tax increase on workers today.

Hutchison, a Republican, is the senior U.S. senator from Texas.
‹ Previous Blog Entry

Your Opinions and Comments

December 22, 2012 5:52am
Alvin....Are you forgetting that Social Security is a form of insurance in addition to a supplemental retirement program ? So, is it your contention that after paying into this type of program for a number of years, their ... More ›

Alvin Charmaine  
December 22, 2012 2:53am
Prairie it isnt greedy to not want to support someone else for the rest of their life. When people who have never worked can live off the govt for there whole lives there is something wrong. Let people opt out and half of ... More ›

December 21, 2012 6:12pm
Hey Alvin.....You sound like Simon Legree....cutting off widow benefits and all that.....Did you decorate Tom's cabin this holiday season. Merry Christmas.

December 21, 2012 11:43am
Rabble Rouser..It stays in the Social Security trust fund. I guess it sorta balances out for those who live longer than expected and survivor benefits. Publicola.....Nice dream.....I would only add the hope that all levels ... More ›

Publius Valerius Publicola  
Rome, Tx.  
December 21, 2012 10:55am
How about this dream. Replace income tax with a national sales tax, everyone pays. No benefits at all for illegals. All politicians retire with only social security benefits and no special medical plans. All laws that bind regular ... More ›

Rabble Rouser Extraordinaire  
Adkins, TX  
December 21, 2012 10:29am
So what or where exactly does the [SS] money go if... A person works for 40 years paying into SS, OASDI, etc., and he passes away before he draws a red cent? Back into the general fund, or is it earmarked and goes somewhere ... More ›

squawk box  
Pandora, Tx  
December 20, 2012 5:08pm
Ex-Tiger......Taxing the rich......It's sorta like when they asked Willie Sutton why he robbed banks and received the answer of "that's where the money is." Our grossly unfair progressive tax systems makes that statement ... More ›

December 20, 2012 7:58am
Ex Tiger......There is no so called "lock box". This notion of a social security box of cash was just an Al Gore hoax and political stunt. Social Security taxes are invested in a special issue type of US treasury bond ... More ›

December 20, 2012 6:54am
If we are trying to reduce the national debt, does it make sense to raise taxes on only two percent of the population who makes over 250,000 or do we make the 46% of Americans who don't pay taxes contribute to reducing the national ... More ›

December 19, 2012 1:06pm
Alvin....During the first half of my working career, it wasn't uncommon to reach your required FICA around the start of the 3rd quarter. Of course the caps on FICA were much smaller during my earlier working years.

Share your comment or opinion on this story!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Not a subscriber?
Subscriber, but no password?
Forgot password?

Commentaries Archives

Commentaries page
Commentaries who represents me?
Voncille Bielefeld homeDrama KidsTriple R DC Expertsauto chooserClarity WellHeavenly Touch homeAllstate & McBride Realty

  Copyright © 2007-2015 Wilson County News. All rights reserved. Web development by Drewa Designs.