Sunday, August 2, 2015
1012 C Street  •  Floresville, TX 78114  •  Phone: 830-216-4519  •  Fax: 830-393-3219  • 

WCN Site Search


Lost & Found


VideoLost Dog 07-31-2015 Shannon Ridge Subdivision Rat Terrier female white w brown spots answers to bebe. Please contact Yolanda Mandigo 830-477-7821
Lost: White Maltese dog, 12 pounds, answers to Brookley, on Sun., July 19, 10 miles north of Floresville on Hwy. 181, $100 reward! Tom and Jean Harris, 830-393-0814. 

VideoLost: Heifer, near 1303 and Country View Land, went missing on June 24, reward! 210-838-0667.
More Lost & Found ads ›

Help Wanted

*Fair Housing notice. All help wanted advertising in this newspaper is subject to the Fair Housing Act which makes it illegal to advertise "any preference limitation or discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, handicap, familial status, or national origin, or an intention, to make any such preference limitation or discrimination." This newspaper will not knowingly accept any advertising for help wanted ads, which is in violation of the law. Our readers are hereby informed that all dwellings advertised in this newspaper are available on an equal opportunity basis.
ON-CALL CRISIS POOL WORKERS NEEDED. Part-time positions are available for after hours “on-call” crisis workers to respond to mental health crisis for Wilson and Karnes Counties. Duties include crisis interventions, assessments, referrals to stabilization services, and referrals for involuntary treatment services according to the Texas Mental Health Laws. You must have at least a Bachelor’s Degree in psychology, sociology, social work, nursing, etc. On-call hours are from 5 p.m.-8 a.m. weekdays, weekends and holidays vary. If selected, you must attend required training and must be able to report to designated safe sites within 1 hour of request for assessment. Compensation is at a rate of $200 per week plus $100 per completed and submitted crisis assessment, and mileage. If interested call Camino Real Community Services, 210-357-0359.
More Help Wanted ads ›

Featured Videos





Video Vault ›
You’ve been granted free access to this subscribers only article.

Agriculture Today


COOL under fire; lawsuit filed against U.S. government




E-Mail this Story to a Friend
Print this Story

Wilson County News
July 17, 2013 | 4,437 views | Post a comment

In the ongoing saga of regulations regarding mandatory Country of Origin Labeling (COOL), a new chapter is being written, but with a twist. As the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) Agricultural Marketing Service posted the revised regulations in the May 24 Federal Register and is in the process of a six-month outreach program to explain the rules, a lawsuit has been filed by U.S. and Canadian organizations.

The new labeling requirements are for muscle cut commodities derived from animals slaughtered in the United States, such as beef and pork. The new requirements brought the United States into compliance with a World Trade Organization ruling regarding mandatory COOL. It involves specifying the country of origin (birth) of the animal, and where it was raised and slaughtered.

The American Meat Institute, the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association, the National Pork Producers Association, and the Southwest Meat Association of College Station, along with four other organizations, united to file suit July 9 against the USDA and the Agricultural Marketing Service in the U.S. District Court.

Among their complaints is the ban on commingling meat from different countries. The lack of commingling meat is just one of three areas cited in the lawsuit by Mark Dopp, American Meat Institute senior vice president of regulatory affairs and general counsel, in a July 9 teleconference.

“The new rule puts meat processing plants and livestock operations, especially along the Canadian and Mexican borders, at risk of going out of business,” Dopp said. He forecasts plants will be put at risk if retailers abandon “mixed products.”

Catherine Stetson, a partner with the Hogan Lovells US LLP, said the rule “doesn’t cure the WTO [World Trade Organization] violation.” The meat and livestock groups charge that the new regulations are a violation of the First Amendment.

The groups contend that “government may compel speech only when there is a substantial government interest, e.g., a warning about a contagious disease where the warning provides public health protection.”

Stetson said, “... ‘Consumer curiosity’ is not a substantial government interest ... and the rules might confuse the consumers.”

The plaintiffs also contend that the new rules “exceed authority granted by the Agricultural Marketing Act.”

Stetson said the groups are not seeking monetary damages from USDA.
 

Your Opinions and Comments


Be the first to comment on this story!


You must be logged in to post a comment.




Not a subscriber?
Subscriber, but no password?
Forgot password?

Agriculture Today Archives


Coupons ag-right
Triple R DC ExpertsVoncille Bielefeld homeDrama Kidsauto chooserAllstate & McBride RealtyHeavenly Touch home

  Copyright © 2007-2015 Wilson County News. All rights reserved. Web development by Drewa Designs.