You’ve been granted free access to this subscribers only article.
Proposition 6 — not a long-term water solution
Darrell T. Brownlow, Ph.D.October 23, 2013 | 4,123 views | 2 comments
This is Part II of an analysis of Proposition 6, to amend the Texas Constitution, on the ballot before voters in the Nov. 5 general election.
Let me begin by saying that I’m not telling anyone how to vote on Proposition 6. If you know enough details and believe it supports your best interests -- whether that is local, regional, or even statewide -- vote for it. I also know that the state water plan includes 15 other regions besides South Central Texas, each with their unique issues. I haven’t studied those plans.
However, a rural landowner who is reliant upon groundwater understands that the value of the surface is worth far less without the rights to the groundwater beneath it. As such, any governmental actions that may diminish the rights to the groundwater and the availability thereof must always be viewed with great caution and even healthy skepticism. Government actions to fund water-supply projects, like all government funds, will most certainly have strings attached. What those “strings” are is unknown at this time.
As I mentioned in Part I last week, my experience is that money, or the lack thereof, has never been the driver in implementing projects in the water plan. My experience is that every entity that proposed projects to the regional planning group was doing so on grounds that there was a demand for that water and those needing the water would be paying for the water.
Certainly, there were some projects more expensive than others and obvious prioritizations were made -- desalination and new reservoirs on the high end and local groundwater and conservation measures on the lower end. As we know, cost is not the only consideration; impact on the environment and private property rights are just as important.
The regional water planning process is complex and dynamic, with changes in demand and supply occurring with each five-year planning cycle. Changes in law, in how regions cooperate with each other, in weather, in regulations, and in scientific knowledge and information often mean that by the time the plan is approved, it is already outdated.
There have been nine legislative sessions over the course of three statewide water plans, and with each legislative session comes change. So what is it about this new funding, specifically of water projects, that would result in a change from the past 15 years? In my opinion, very little.
Would access to the new money address the critical issues that have prevented us from implementing water projects in the past? Would the new funding increase our knowledge and understanding of the aquifers and the effects of overpumping?
Would the money help clean our rivers and improve the habitats of our bays and estuaries? Would the money be used to increase our knowledge of the relationship between groundwater and surface water? Would the money be used to better fund and staff our regulatory agencies such that more timely analysis of new permit or permit modification requests and decision-making can occur?
Would the money be used to sufficiently fund the Texas Water Development Board’s own efforts to work with the groundwater districts and groundwater management areas that are tasked with defining the available groundwater in rural areas? Would the money even support more funding for the regional water-planning process in a manner sufficient such that the entities whose projects may receive funding are not having to subsidize the water-planning process itself?
While it is a fact that the water plan is obviously far more complex than the way I described it in Part I, in my opinion, the absence of funding for these issues is the real driver in why it takes so long to get anything done. Until these fundamental issues are adequately addressed, simply directing money to implement specific water projects is unlikely to yield the results the politicians are claiming will occur. It’s analogous to a boy who breaks his leg and is given the money to buy a bicycle. Fix what’s broken first, then buy the bicycle.
And now there is a new demand on rural groundwater -- “frack” water, a demand that was not recognized in the 2012 State Water Plan. There is little argument that the Texas economy, and nowhere more evident than in the Eagle Ford region of South Texas, has boomed because of the windfall of shale fracking. That windfall is directly related to the availability of groundwater in the rural areas.
Except for reducing some availability of groundwater that the big municipalities may desire, fracking does not take water away from the large municipalities that need water. Fracking is occurring principally in areas where the regional water plan indicates that unallocated groundwater supplies are reported to exist.
This fact suggests to me that the rural groundwater interests -- primarily agriculture, livestock, small rural municipalities -- should work toward forming an alliance with oil and gas operators to ensure adequate groundwater supplies are available for meeting both the fracking needs and the existing and expanding rural water needs.
In closing, all of us -- both rural and urban residents -- must recognize that with access to surface water so heavily restricted and with the Edwards Aquifer limited by environmental concerns, all the “cheap” water is gone. But turning to rural groundwater and backing it with big state dollars has its own drawbacks, as I have outlined, and it’s ultimately not a long-term solution either.
I realize most of my words here may not win me any friends with the politicians and lobbyists who are anxiously awaiting the power associated with dividing up $2 billion, but maybe, just maybe, there’s at least one legislator out there who will more closely examine and supervise the spending after this thing passes.
Darrell Brownlow is a geologist with a Ph.D. from Texas Tech University. From 1999 to 2012, he was a small business representative to the South Central Texas Regional Water Planning group and from 2001‐11, he was Gov. Perry’s appointee to the Evergreen Groundwater Conservation District. He currently serves as an elected director on the board of the San Antonio River Authority. He is a rancher and landowner in Wilson and LaSalle counties. His opinions are his own and are not intended to reflect the views of any board or organization which he currently serves upon or has in the past.
Your Opinions and Comments
October 25, 2013 3:48pm
Share your comment or opinion on this story!
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Section A: General News Archives
Berger earns Ph.D. from Columbia University (May 18, 2016)
Brahma Happenings (May 18, 2016)
Burning body spurs murder investigation (May 18, 2016)
Can I negotiate? (May 18, 2016)
Court Update (May 18, 2016)
Editorial: Narrow views promote intellectual, moral dry rot (May 18, 2016)
Editorial: The political climate in America goes from bad to worse (May 18, 2016)
Falls City ISD’s new K-12 building almost complete (May 18, 2016)
Floresville parks master plan would relocate ball fields (May 18, 2016)
Floresville parks plan wins council approval (May 18, 2016)
Foundation awards $9K in grants (May 18, 2016)
Foundation opens health grant process (May 18, 2016)
Graco recalls booster seats (May 18, 2016)
Grass fires on the rise (May 18, 2016)
Letter: An open letter to Congress (May 18, 2016)
Letter: Illegal immigration: Who will laugh last? (May 18, 2016)
Letter: What Hispanic vote? (May 18, 2016)
Lone Star Greys to meet (May 18, 2016)
Meeting Watch: La Vernia City Council (May 18, 2016)
Meeting Watch: Poth ISD (May 18, 2016)
Police Blotter (May 18, 2016)
Police recover one of two stolen trucks (May 18, 2016)
Register for free watercolor lesson (May 18, 2016)
Stockdale campus to get upgrade soon (May 18, 2016)
Stockdale City Council approves electronic payment processing (May 18, 2016)
TAMU-SA matches student scholarships (May 18, 2016)
Time to make plans to attend Jubilee (May 18, 2016)
Want fire protection? Attend May 19 hearing (May 18, 2016)
Acme Gold Buyers marks fifth year in Floresville (May 11, 2016)
All Veterans Job Fair (May 11, 2016)
Cemetery group to meet (May 11, 2016)
Children’s Alliance enhances care services (May 11, 2016)
China Grove mayor, police chief trade barbs at meeting (May 11, 2016)
Commissioners lukewarm toward hot coffee at library (May 11, 2016)
Competency and integrity (May 11, 2016)
Court Update (May 11, 2016)
Coy to get Ranger Cross (May 11, 2016)
Cub Scout Roundup (May 11, 2016)
Donate blood in May (May 11, 2016)
Editor: Trump’s candidacy sets in motion affliction in future elections (May 11, 2016)
Editorial: The voters have spoken — well, some of them have! (May 11, 2016)
Former Sutherland Springs VFD considered as a substation (May 11, 2016)
Free caregivers class starts May 26 (May 11, 2016)
Information sought in Walmart theft (May 11, 2016)
Lack of super majority vote keeps Clean Water Rule flowing (May 11, 2016)
Leetter: The government is a terrible investor (May 11, 2016)
Letter: Injection well site is near river, creeks (May 11, 2016)
Letter: Stop being negative (May 11, 2016)
LV youths win new wheels at Bike Rodeo (May 11, 2016)
Meeting Watch: La Vernia ISD (May 11, 2016)
Mineral rights workshop set (May 11, 2016)
Miss LV Pageant, Bluebonnet Parade, graduation fill La Vernia calendar (May 11, 2016)
New Wilson County justice center nears completion (May 11, 2016)
Personalized brick for Veterans Memorial (May 11, 2016)
Police Blotter (May 11, 2016)
Precinct 3 primary runoff is May 24 (May 11, 2016)
Rangers to honor Lorenz (May 11, 2016)
Rohrs takes over Floresville athletics (May 11, 2016)
Tanneberger qualifies for Executive Club membership (May 11, 2016)
Voters respond: One bond passes, another fails (May 11, 2016)
Wednesday morning crash injures nine (May 11, 2016)
AACOG plans public meeting (May 4, 2016)
Accident injures two drivers (May 4, 2016)
AgriLife offers tips to protect from Zika, other mosquito-borne diseases (May 4, 2016)
Behind the lens: Solitary stillness (May 4, 2016)
Celebration Mass June 12 (May 4, 2016)
Cemetery association meeting (May 4, 2016)
Condos are fine, but do your research (May 4, 2016)
Court Update (May 4, 2016)
Crime Stoppers aids police anonymously (May 4, 2016)
DA, DPS bust nets 86 charges (May 4, 2016)
Debate over citizens comments dominates Floresville council (May 4, 2016)
Dwellings At Home offers lodge, ranch furnishings, more (May 4, 2016)
Editorial: Overbearing city council threatens boards’ independence (May 4, 2016)
Editorial: Taking personal responsibility will bring possibilities (May 4, 2016)
Editorial: Trump is the same old song with one more verse (May 4, 2016)
FEDC tables recommendation of master parks plan (May 4, 2016)
FELPS tornado repair continues as FEMA help stalls (May 4, 2016)
Floresville Chamber Luncheon May 18 (May 4, 2016)
Hall of Fame inductees: Joe Kotwig, Malcolm and Beverly Talley (May 4, 2016)
Letter: Alamo Colleges: A bust for Floresville (May 4, 2016)
Local nursing homes plan Senior Olympics May 9-13 (May 4, 2016)
Look twice for motorcycle riders (May 4, 2016)
Lyssy’s vault earns gold, sets records! (May 4, 2016)
Medicaid, CHIP application assistance (May 4, 2016)
Meeting Watch: Wilson County Commissioners Court (May 4, 2016)
National Day of Prayer May 5 (May 4, 2016)
Police Blotter (May 4, 2016)
Ramirez promoted to colonel (May 4, 2016)
Reserve a seat for SA Tea Party (May 4, 2016)
Tanneberger tops in sales (May 4, 2016)
Treviño prepares to take reins of East Central athletics (May 4, 2016)