Thursday, May 5, 2016
1012 C Street  •  Floresville, TX 78114  •  Phone: 830-216-4519  •  Fax: 830-393-3219  • 

WCN Site Search

Preview the Paper Preview the Paper

Preview this week's Paper
A limited number of pages are displayed in this preview.
Preview this Week’s Issue ›
Subscribe Today ›

Lost & Found

VideoFound: Male Lab mix, light brown, neon orange collar (Reminton), St. Hedwig near Lubianski's Feed store. 210-859-1546.
Terrier mix, female, "Marma," missing near F.M. 427/C.R. 537, 30 lbs., orange/red medium length fur, can be extremely shy. Call or text if seen, 210-440-3889.
Lost: Border Collie, black and white male, one eye, microchipped, C.R. 319/F.M. 775 area. 210-382-2167.
More Lost & Found ads ›

Help Wanted

CITY OF POTH is currently accepting applications for the position of Utility Worker through May 6, 2016. Must be able to stand and walk for most of the day, operate heavy equipment. Outdoor work required all year-round, High School Diploma or equivalent, Valid Texas Driver’s License, Class D Waste Water/Water a plus. Pre-employment physical and drug test is required if a tentative offer of employment is made. Applications available at Poth City Hall, 200 N. Carroll St. Poth, TX and at, benefit package, EOE.
Need live-in companion for elderly man, La Vernia area, room/board, salary and days off, take care of daily personal care/needs, light cleaning, grocery shopping, prefer no smoking or can smoke in garage. 830-581-9599.
More Help Wanted ads ›

Featured Videos

Video Vault ›
You’ve been granted free access to this subscribers only article.

Agriculture Today

Ag producers make waves over mud puddles

E-Mail this Story to a Friend
Print this Story

Wilson County News
March 5, 2014 | 6,089 views | Post a comment

The U.S. government may regulate mud puddles on private land in the future. A “leaked” document from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is making waves in the agricultural community. Changes in the Clean Water Act sent to the Office of Management and Budget for interagency review referenced wetlands which could interpret standing water -- puddles -- as “wetlands.” While agriculture is exempt in the proposal, there are concerns about more government permits and intervention regarding surface water rights.

“As it now stands, there are federal proposals that would allow jurisdiction over so-called waters that are not even wet,” American Farm Bureau Federation President Bob Stallman said during the Farm Bureau’s annual convention in mid-January. “That includes areas such as ditches that are dry for weeks and months on end. That represents little more than federal regulatory intrusion and would greatly hamper the ability of many farm families to put their land to productive use for food production.”

Eric Opiela, a fifth-generation Texan, rancher, and property-rights advocate, offered some insight.

“Our surface water resources are under attack from the federal government -- in just the last year under the guise of the Endangered Species Act, both federal courts and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service have proposed placing our river systems under federal control,” Opiela said.

In a Feb. 25 phone interview, Opiela addressed why the ag sector is concerned about the proposed rules.

What is ‘wet’?

Opiela explained that the term “wetlands” in the proposed rule is the source of ag concerns. See “Wetlands” for more.

If someone applies for assistance with the Natural Resources Conservation Service to build a terrace or has applied for a Farm Service Agency loan with the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), wetlands documentation is required to complete the application.

If standing water -- after a good rain -- remains, the mud puddles could be deemed “wetlands” in the future. This could prevent a landowner from utilizing the land for agricultural production.

According to the USDA, the Natural Resources Conservation Service “has the ability to make wetland determinations based on landowners’ requests.”

While the ag sector is given exemptions in the proposed rules, it is not exempt when it comes to wetlands, Opiela said. The proposed rule is an attempt to redefine “waters of the United States,” including wetlands, Opiela said.

One challenge to a similar attempt was the Supreme Court case of Solid Waste Agency of Northern Cook County versus the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in 2001. The court case rejected the EPA and the Corps of Engineers’ authority to regulate isolated waters based upon the potential presence of migratory birds under the Migratory Bird Rule. This case involved free-standing wetlands.

Now the government is attempting to redefine “waters of the United States” to include bodies of water that don’t drain into other bodies -- such as rivers. Wetlands, as determined by USDA personnel, now could be included under the Clean Water Act, Opiela explained.

Opiela said the proposed changes have a way to go. This involves a proposal, a comment period, and implementation of the rule. He foresees a lawsuit.

This is “a long process ... and the people need to be aware of this,” Opiela said.

If the USDA-designated wetlands would go under the Clean Water Act, the ag industry would find it difficult to farm, since filling or disturbing a wetland is prohibited.

Opiela discouraged allowing USDA personnel to make the determination, and the negative financial impact it would have on property values.

He said if standing water is found when government personnel visit a property, an “affirmative determination” might be filed, even if this water stands for only a few days.

“When half of our river flow is dedicated to preservation of endangered species, and construction of new surface water resources is halted due to the Endangered Species Act and the Clean Water Act, we have no option but to stand up on behalf of all Texans and fight these efforts,” Opiela said.

If approved, the government “would revise the existing definition of ‘waters of the United States’ consistent with the science and the Supreme Court cases,” according to the proposed rules.

Farm Bureau weighs in

Texas Farm Bureau President Kenneth Dierschke addressed this “draft” proposed rule when he spoke to the House Science, Space, and Technology Committee Feb. 5 in Washington, D.C.

“We believe the draft rule fails to comply with important regulator safeguards and is based on a scientific report that has not had sufficient peer review,” Dierschke said. “It is troubling that EPA’s ‘scientific’ report implies that, because nearly all water is in some way connected, EPA’s authority under the CWA [Clean Water Act] is virtually limitless. ... The impact of this broad interpretation, if rolled into federal regulation, will mean more permits, additional permit requirements, and government and environmental group scrutiny of the things we do in agriculture, and the threat of additional litigation against farmers and ranchers.”

Wetlands for regulatory purposes under the Clean Water Act are “those areas that are inundated or saturated by surface or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that under normal circumstances do support, a prevalence of vegetation typically adapted for life in saturated soil conditions. Wetlands generally include swamps, marshes, bogs, and similar areas.”

Wetlands are divided into three groups:
• “Marine wetlands occur in coastal shallows.
• “Tidal wetlands occur in coastal areas but inland from the oceans.
• “Non-tidal wetlands occur inland and are not subject to tidal floodplains.”

Sources: Environmental Protection Agency website; and USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service

Your Opinions and Comments

Be the first to comment on this story!

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Not a subscriber?
Subscriber, but no password?
Forgot password?

Agriculture Today Archives

Coupons ag-right
Heavenly Touch homeTriple R DC ExpertsVoncille Bielefeld homeAllstate & McBride RealtyEast Central Driving School

  Copyright © 2007-2016 Wilson County News. All rights reserved. Web development by Drewa Designs.