Sunday, December 11, 2016
1012 C Street  •  Floresville, TX 78114  •  Phone: 830-216-4519  •  Fax: 830-393-3219  • 

WCN Site Search


Preview the Paper Preview the Paper

Preview this week's Paper
A limited number of pages are displayed in this preview.
Preview this Week’s Issue ›
Subscribe Today ›

Lost & Found


VideoPlease help me find my dog. His name is Archie and was last seen on black jack road. My contact information is,210.919.0183
Found: Red Chihuahua, male, friendly but frightened, need to find his owner, in Floresville. 830-534-6413.

VideoFound: Dog, chocolate color, on old Pittman Rd., be prepared to prove it's your dog, looking for owner. Call or text Tammy at 830-391-6662.
More Lost & Found ads ›

Help Wanted

Floresville ISD is accepting applications at www.fisd.us for the following position: Bus driver.
Be skeptical of ads that say you can make lots of money working from the comfort of your home. If this were true, wouldn’t we all be working at home?
More Help Wanted ads ›

Featured Videos





Video Vault ›

Commentaries


Voting FOR energy




E-Mail this Story to a Friend
Print this Story

Disclaimer:
The author of this entry is responsible for this content, which is not edited by the Wilson County News or wilsoncountynews.com.
June 23, 2016 | 615 views | Post a comment

By Robert L. Bradley, Jr.

Despite the divisiveness of this election season, Americans from both parties share common ground. Polls show voters want the next president to inject life into our sluggish economy.

To turn around the economy, the next president will need to embrace free-market, consumer-driven, pro-taxpayer, policies. And when it comes to energy, that means the market's preference for oil, natural gas, and coal. Candidates and voters take heed: the 2016 presidential contest is a referendum on energy.

The next president should promptly undo President Obama's anti-energy agenda.

A good start would be to reverse the decision to reject the Keystone XL pipeline. This project would have transported oil from Western Canada to America's Gulf Coast, creating 42,000 jobs in the process.

Early action is also required to scale back the Obama administration's costly environmental regulations. That includes the president's job-killing fiat requiring companies to reduce greenhouse emissions and his "Waters of the U.S." rules, which greatly expanded the amount of water under federal jurisdiction.

And, the next president should prioritize the development of fossil fuels.

Fossil fuels are the lynchpin of the American economy. The oil and gas industry supports 9.8 million jobs nationwide and contributes over $1.2 trillion to the U.S. economy annually. The recent shale energy revolution has saved American families and businesses an average of $1,200 a year for electricity, and $550 annually at the pump.

It's no surprise then that the presidential candidates are acknowledging the importance of energy.

Hillary Clinton recently did an about-face on her comments that the growth of clean energy would "put a lot of coal miners and coal companies out of business." After facing public backlash, she claimed the comment was taken out of context and apologized for giving "folks the reason and the excuse to be so upset with me."

Meanwhile, Donald Trump recently spelled out a reasonable, responsible energy agenda that embraces free-market policies, including the elimination of regulations that, in his words, "impose undue costs on business enterprises."

Yet environmental activists have ignored the benefits of fossil fuels and unleashed a wave of hysteria over pro-energy policies. Khalid Pitts, the political director for the Sierra Club, described Trump's ideas as "a profound blow to common sense, the future of the planet, and families across the country."

Meanwhile, Paul Higgins, the director of the American Meteorological Society's policy program, said fossil fuels are dangerous because "we cannot know in advance at what point human-caused climate changes will lead to catastrophic societal consequences."

But evidence now suggests that manmade activities haven't affected the climate as much as originally thought.

A new study reveals that due to an error in assessing cloud formations before industrialization, many climate warming projections for the coming years are grossly exaggerated. In fact, global warming forecasts from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change -- the global authority on climate change -- may be four times bigger than the actual figures.

Moreover, current policies from green radicals aren't helping even by their own criteria for success.

According to a recent statement from former Department of Energy Assistant Secretary Charles McConnell, the president's Clean Power Plan "will not significantly impact global emissions." He added: "All of the U.S. annual emissions in 2025 will be offset by three weeks of Chinese emissions. Three weeks... Is this impactful climate regulation? I think not."

Voters want a stronger economy. The moment is now for an expanded role for oil, gas, and coal in energy-superpower America. Candidates take note.

Robert L. Bradley, Jr. is the founder and CEO of the Institute for Energy Research.
 
‹ Previous Blog Entry
 

Your Opinions and Comments


Be the first to comment on this story!


You must be logged in to post a comment.




Not a subscriber?
Subscriber, but no password?
Forgot password?

Commentaries Archives


Commentaries
Commentaries page govtrack.us
Commentaries who represents me?
Friesenhahn Custom WeldingTriple R DC ExpertsVoncille Bielefeld homeAllstate & McBride RealtyHeavenly Touch home

  Copyright © 2007-2016 Wilson County News. All rights reserved. Web development by Drewa Designs.